Premium Essay

Bbby

In: Business and Management

Submitted By tuongntm
Words 7236
Pages 29
February 28, 2014
Volume XL, Issue II

Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.
Nasdaq: BBBY
Dow Jones Indus: 16,321.71
S&P 500:
1,859.45
Russell 2000:
1,183.03
Index Component: S&P 500

Initially Probed: Volume XXXVIII, Issue VII & VIII @ $69.77
Last Probed: Volume XXXIX, Issue XI & XII @ $76.52
Trigger: No
Type of Situation: Business Value

Price:
Shares Outstanding (MM):
Fully Diluted (MM):
Average Daily Volume (MM):

$ 67.82
209.7
212.3 (1.2%)
2.6

Market Cap (MM):
Enterprise Value (MM):
Percentage Closely Held:

$ 14.2
$ 13.4
Insiders ~4%

52-Week High/Low:
5-Year High/Low:

$ 80.82/56.37
$ 80.82/19.52

Trailing Twelve Months
Price/Earnings:
Price/Stated Book Value:

13.8x
3.4x

Net Cash & Investments (MM):
Upside to Estimate of
Intrinsic Value:

$ 781

Dividend:
Yield:

$ NA
NA

Net Revenue Per Share:
LTM:
2012:
2011:
2010:

$
$
$
$

Earnings Per Share:
2012:
2011:
2010:

Overview
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. (“BBBY” or “the
Company”) is a major operator within the retail sector.
BBBY operates roughly 1,500 stores and employs approximately 57,000 people throughout North
America, and the firm generates annual revenue of over
$10 billion. The stores are primarily located in the U.S., and consist of the following brands: Bed Bath &
Beyond, Christmas Tree Shops, Harmon, buybuy
BABY, and Cost Plus World Market. BBBY’s product line includes a wide range of domestic merchandise and home furnishings. Examples of BBBY’s product assortment include bed linens, bath items, kitchen textiles, tabletop items, basic housewares, and general home furnishings and consumables.

$ 4.56
$ 4.06
$ 3.07

Fiscal Year Ends:
Company Address:
Telephone:
CEO:

47%

55.12
44.75
38.95
33.93

A key driver of BBBY’s past success has been its coherent and well-executed strategy. BBBY has achieved an impressive…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Bed Bath & Beyond Case Solutions

...The business risk of BBBY can be categorized as medium to low. On the low side that is due to the fact that BBBY is a common goods company and the risk of default in the common goods industry is relatively low. But BBBY also has a lot of competitors with a higher market share and some of them even offer a higher ROE, like Best Buy (23.4%) and William Sonoma’s just a little above BBBY’s (19.5%), compared to BBBY ROE of 20.1%. The main competitors are chains of superstores such as Target and Best Buy. While BBBY has no debt on its balance sheets due to the conservatism of its management team, it invested a lot of its money in short-term securities and lately these investments weren’t profitable enough due to the low interest earned. Therefore, it is clear that the company needs a new strategy as to the future of their excess funds. As mentioned above, we believe that the company does have a lot of excess cash that needs to be organized in a better way to provide its owners with a higher return. The company could pay out the excess cash as one time dividend or it could implement stock repurchasing. As for the first alternative, it is highly inefficient because if the company offers higher ROE than the current market does, it should keep the money in the company. Companies always do what is best for their shareholders. Therefore, it leaves us with only one option – to repurchase some of the shares back from the public to increase the price of the stock that will remain......

Words: 1168 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Bed Bath & Beyond

...of Harvard College. To order copies or request permission to reproduce materials, call 1-800-545-7685, write Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston, MA 02163, or go to http://www.hbsp.harvard.edu. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, used in a spreadsheet, or transmitted in any form or by any means—electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise—without the permission of Harvard Business School. 1 196-123 Bed Bath & Beyond Bed Bath & Beyond’s (BBBY) stock price fell over 10 percent from $29 to $25.5 in the days following Norton’s article in Barron’s. The article suggested that BBBY’s requests for extended payment schedules with suppliers was a sign that the company was not flush with cash, and that BBBY’s inventories appeared to be building up. The article cited stock sales by insiders as signs that the best gains for this stock were past. Analysts, however, stood behind the stock and continued to rate BBBY a BUY. “There’s growth potential with new stores, and with the maturation of existing stores,” said Amy E. Ryan, an analyst at Prudential Securities, Inc. “This stock is just very attractive.” Beth A. Heming, a Piper Jaffrey analyst, upgraded her rating to a strong buy after the Barron’s article depressed the stock. She believed it was a stock without much risk and was confident that internal or current cash flow could accommodate an even more aggressive expansion plan. “I’m very impressed with the......

Words: 13498 - Pages: 54

Premium Essay

Linen N Things

...Company’s average store size of approximately 33,000 gross square feet enables it to offer a more comprehensive product and brand selection than department stores and other retailers that sell home furnishings. The Company’s primary target guest is female between the ages of 25 and 55 who is fashion and brand conscious, has better income and focuses on the home as a reflection of her individuality. On the surface, LNT and BBBY companies were pursuing a similar business-level strategy of cost leadership, but key strategic decisions led them down quite different evolutionary paths. Both companies focused on providing consumers with high-quality houseware goods in a no-frills, value-priced environment, but LNT's decision to build centralized warehouses - seemingly consistent with a cost leadership strategy - ended up bringing it into direct competition with Target and Walmart. In contrast, BBBY allowed for greater decentralization in decision making, thereby allowing more store-level decision making and greater customization to local consumers' tastes. As a result, BBBY was able to better differentiate itself from Walmart and Target. The case will need formulation of basic strategy concepts, such as industry and environmental analysis, business-level strategies, core competencies and administrative heritage. At the time of the case (February 2006), BBBY's market capitalization was approximately $10.7 billion, while LNT had just been acquired for $1.3 billion by a private......

Words: 958 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Test

...& Beyond. BBBY’s Business Strategy BBBY’s strategy consisted of three major components. First, BBBY delivered outstanding value by offering name brand and better quality merchandise at every-day low prices. Its prices were 40 percent below department store prices and even lower than department store sale prices. Second, the superstore format enabled the company to offer a huge selection of merchandise with both breadth and depth in its product lines and 30,000 SKUs (stock keeping units). Last, BBBY provided well defined superior service from the time the customer drove into the parking lot to the time they left the store, and even when the customer returned merchandise. Delivering Value Bed Bath & Beyond provides value to the customer by offering the better quality merchandise found at department stores at prices at or below the department store sale prices and 20 to 40 percent below department store regular prices. These low prices meant that customers no longer had to look for a sale at the department store, but rather could shop any day at BBBY and get the sale price. The shelves were filled with quality name brands such as Fieldcrest, Laura Ashley, and Rubbermaid. When branded manufacturers did not allow heavy discounting on their brands, BBBY did not carry those products, but rather replaced them with comparable merchandise. BBBY was able to earn good margins despite selling goods at low prices for several reasons. First,......

Words: 1098 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Case Bed, Bath & Beyond

...excess cash and issuing debt, BBBY could improve return to equity holders and raise earnings per share (by a share repurchase). Leverage can increase a firm’s expected earnings per share. An argument is that by doing so, leverage should also increase the firm’s stock price. Because BBBY has no debt, they pay no interest, and because in perfect capital markets there are no taxes, BBBY’s earnings would equal its EBIT. If BBBY has new debt, they will have interest payments each year, so their earnings will decrease (EBIT – interest). If BBBY uses the debt to repurchase shares, the number of outstanding shares will also fall. Because of this, the earnings per share can increase with leverage. This increase might appear to make shareholders better off and could potentially lead to an increase in the stock price. Besides this, BBBY faces the risk that the firm is not attracting investors. Investors want to maximize their returns and when the firm has a lot of cash, the investors may not be sure of the ability of BBBY to maximize the shareholder value. Another positive point about debt is the tax deduction. In favor: -Leverage increases the risk of equity even when there’s no risk that the firm will default. Thus, while debt may be cheaper when considered on its own, it raises the cost of capital for equity. -Cash can be a buffer in tough times. -When a firm has a lot of cash, there is more money available to invest. As you can read in the case, BBBY invests in a lot of......

Words: 1322 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Buther

...Ratio Analysis SGR and IGR Analysis Forecasting Valuation Analysis Cost of Equity Cost of Debt WACC Method of Comparables Intrinsic Valuation Models Altman Z-Score Analyst Recommendation Appendix Works Cited 3 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 14 16 16 18 20 21 23 26 29 30 31 31 37 44 46 47 47 61 61 66 67 68 72 78 79 80 84 1 2 Executive Summary Investment Recommendation: Overvalued, Sell BBBY – NASDAQ $40.40 52 week range $30.92 - $43.32 Revenue (2006) $5,809,562,000 Market Capitalization $11.75 Billion Shares Outstanding 283,380,000 3-month Avg. Daily Trading Volume 2,332,640 Institutional Ownership 83.40% Insider Ownership 3.70% Book Value Per Share (mrq) $9.35 ROE 25.99% ROA 17.90% Est. 5 year EPS Growth Rate 9.00% Cost of Capital Est. R2 Beta Ke Ke Estimated 13.01% 10-Year 37.4 2.28 15.87% 7-Year 37.4 2.28 12.56% 5-Year 37.5 2.29 12.62% 1-Year 37.8 2.30 12.71% 3-Month 37.8 2.31 13.01% Published 1.76 Kd BBBY: 5.74% Revised: 2.66% WACC BBBY: 12.03% Revised: 10.3% Altman Z-Score BBBY: 8.05 04/1/2007 EPS Forecast FYE 03/03 2006(A) 2007(E) 2008(E) 2009(E) EPS 2.40 2.66 2.90 3.16 Ratio Comparison BBBY Trailing P/E 16.81 Forward P/E 15.19 P/B 4.26 P/EBITDA 12.54 Industry 18.49 20.08 2.28 15.67 Valuation Estimates: Actual Price (04/01/2007) $40.40 Comparable Valuations Trailing P/E $44.38 Forward P/E $53.41 P/B $21.64 P/EBITDA $50.46 Intrinsic Valuations Actual Discounted Dividends N/A Free Cash Flows $60.42 Residual Income $16.07 Abnormal Earnings Growth $3.92 Revised N/A......

Words: 24507 - Pages: 99

Premium Essay

This Is Ntohing

...billion, net income of $339 million and net sales of $4.5 billion, representing 22% growth in revenue and 32% growth in income as compared to the previous year. In addition to the 575 Bed Bath and Beyond stores, BBBY also owns 30 Harmon Stores, a discount health, and beauty aid retailer, and 24 Christmas Tree Shops, a retailer of home décor, giftware, and seasonal merchandise. Results of operations for both the Harmon Stores and the Christmas Tree Shops are included in the companies consolidated results of operations and have been since the date of acquisition. Bed Bath and Beyond is currently the largest superstore domestics retailer, although their market share is only 4%. Competitors like Target, Wal-Mart and JC Penney offer a wider variety of merchandise such as apparel and electronics. Since 2002 growth has been a result of acquiring the Christmas Tree Shops and the Harmon Stores. In addition BBBY believes that their product offerings, customer service and advertising program have contributed to the company's financial success. Business risk in the case of BBBY is low if you only consider that the products they sell are produced by name brand companies, so any products needing repair could be sent directly to the name brand company. By passing BBBY and that BBBY has no control over the quality of the products they sell and that there are no significant switching costs. However, their degree of operating advantage is high at 2.93 (Exhibit 1) which would indicate high......

Words: 334 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Roche

...may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, used in a spreadsheet, or transmitted in any form or by any means—electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise—without the permission of Harvard Business School. 1 This document is authorized for use only by Maarten Voogd (maartenvoogd@hotmail.com). Copying or posting is an infringement of copyright. Please contact customerservice@harvardbusiness.org or 800-988-0886 for additional copies. 196-123 Bed Bath & Beyond Bed Bath & Beyond’s (BBBY) stock price fell over 10 percent from $29 to $25.5 in the days following Norton’s article in Barron’s. The article suggested that BBBY’s requests for extended payment schedules with suppliers was a sign that the company was not flush with cash, and that BBBY’s inventories appeared to be building up. The article cited stock sales by insiders as signs that the best gains for this stock were past. Analysts, however, stood behind the stock and continued to rate BBBY a BUY. “There’s growth potential with new stores, and with the maturation of existing stores,” said Amy E. Ryan, an analyst at Prudential Securities, Inc. “This stock is just very attractive.” Beth A. Heming, a Piper Jaffrey analyst, upgraded her rating to a strong buy after the Barron’s article depressed the stock. She believed it was a stock without much risk and was confident that internal or current cash flow could accommodate an even more aggressive expansion plan. “I’m very impressed with the......

Words: 14554 - Pages: 59

Premium Essay

Bbby

...warehouse. The new superstores would stack inventory from floor to ceiling in order to bypass the need for a central warehouse. This approach gave Bed Bath & Beyond or BBBY a competitive advantage in that it could open their superstores anywhere in the U.S. without constraint. They didn’t have to consider shipping or warehouse restrictions because their inventory was on site and if they didn’t have what the customers wanted in stock then they would have the item shipped to the customer within the next day. Essentially, they could build a superstore in any market they desired which was a huge competitive advantage. Competitors whom used central warehouses were constrained to certain markets which lead to over saturation of the markets they already operated in and this was something BBBY didn’t have to worry about. By August 1994, BBBY had 49 stores and only four of which weren’t superstores. They now operated in 1.8 million square feet with each store carrying 30,000 SKUs. Since BBBY held such a large amount and variety of household items, they were able to be the one-stop shop for consumers looking for all household items excluding large items such as appliances and carpeting. Bed Bath & Beyond operated in the U.S. domestics and housewares industry that was estimated to be $48 billion in 1993. With BBBY operating in such a large market, there is always room for growth especially if you see year over year sales growth. Bed Bath & Beyond saw significant sales......

Words: 3496 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Bbby Questions

...Q. 1: Explain how Bed Bath & Beyond practices the retailing concept. A. 1: Bed Bath and Beyond practices the retailing concept by being value-driven and goal oriented. By maintaining annual sales of 6 billion (not to mention the 15 years of consecutive profit), BB&B has clearly met the customer's standards by offering convenient and multiple store locations, excellent store atmosphere, and an assortment of indispensable merchandise. BB&B also practices the retailing concept by giving their customer a total retail experience. When a customer ventures into a BB&B store, they aren't just looking to purchase a product, they are seeking a pleasant shopping experience. For those who have never shopped at a BB&B (hard to believe since they have become such an enormous and highly regarded franchise), one can tell why customers have chosen to become such long-term investors with the company. Bed Bath & Beyond stores are generally located off all major highways or large plazas with well-proportioned parking lots and easy access to the main doors. Inside Bed Bath & Beyond franchises, the store is regularly staffed with a large quantity of friendly and ‘well-kept' sales associates who are willing to approach and help the customer in finding their particular needs. Also, BB&B offers good value to their customers by keeping them informed in regards to special store promotions whether by mailing list or basic in store flyers. Q. 2: Evaluate Bed Bath & Beyonds's growth plans. A.......

Words: 722 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Bed Bath and Beyond

...of Equity Cost of Debt WACC Method of Comparables Intrinsic Valuation Models Altman Z-Score Analyst Recommendation Appendix Works Cited 1 3 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 14 16 16 18 20 21 23 26 29 30 31 31 37 44 46 47 47 61 61 66 67 68 72 78 79 80 84 2 Executive Summary Investment Recommendation: Overvalued, Sell BBBY – NASDAQ $40.40 52 week range $30.92 - $43.32 Revenue (2006) $5,809,562,000 Market Capitalization $11.75 Billion Shares Outstanding 283,380,000 3-month Avg. Daily Trading Volume 2,332,640 Institutional Ownership 83.40% Insider Ownership 3.70% Book Value Per Share (mrq) $9.35 ROE 25.99% ROA 17.90% Est. 5 year EPS Growth Rate 9.00% Cost of Capital Est. R2 Beta Ke Ke Estimated 13.01% 10-Year 37.4 2.28 15.87% 7-Year 37.4 2.28 12.56% 5-Year 37.5 2.29 12.62% 1-Year 37.8 2.30 12.71% 3-Month 37.8 2.31 13.01% Published 1.76 Kd BBBY: 5.74% Revised: 2.66% WACC BBBY: 12.03% Revised: 10.3% Altman Z-Score BBBY: 8.05 04/1/2007 EPS Forecast FYE 03/03 2006(A) 2007(E) 2008(E) 2009(E) EPS 2.40 2.66 2.90 3.16 Ratio Comparison BBBY Trailing P/E 16.81 Forward P/E 15.19 P/B 4.26 P/EBITDA 12.54 Industry 18.49 20.08 2.28 15.67 Valuation Estimates: Actual Price (04/01/2007) $40.40 Comparable Valuations Trailing P/E $44.38 Forward P/E $53.41 P/B $21.64 P/EBITDA $50.46 Intrinsic Valuations Actual Discounted Dividends N/A Free Cash Flows $60.42 Residual......

Words: 24507 - Pages: 99

Premium Essay

Bbby

...upload the answers to the BBBY Case study: 1. Assess Bed, Bath & Beyond’s (BBBY) business, operating, and expansion strategies. Are these strategies consistent with one another? What, if any, changes would you make to these strategies? Raja Business Strategy: BBBY’s continued success can be attributed through their value to customers, superstore format, superior customer service and everyday low prices. BBBY delivered value to the consumer by offering quality merchandise at or below department store sale prices. Superstore layout allowed BBBY to carry a wide range of merchandise in large quantities. BBBY provides exceptional customer service and their customers provided word-of-mouth publicity for the brand. Operating Strategy: BBBY focuses more on offering the better quality products at or below sale prices compared to department stores and this strategy helped customers not to wait for sale. BBBY sustains a strong position in the home furnishings industry, with Strouds, Lechters, JC Penney, and Linens n Things being the most prominent competitors. BBBY’s competitors are competing with its successful superstore format with reasonable success. The superstore format allowed BBBY to carry widespread inventory at stores, and removed their dependency on warehouses. BBBY avoided substantial costs on warehouses by building superstores and it allowed them decentralize their store network and operations management. Decentralized network helped BBBY to find stores......

Words: 1016 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

No Pa

...Accounting and Finance for Technology Abstract Objective: To analyze the effects of Bed Bath & Beyond’s (BBBY) rapid expansion strategy on the company and to determine if such a strategy is sustainable. Methods: We used data extracted from financial statements and applied sustainability ratios such as the DuPont ratio. Results: Bed Bath & Beyond will greatly benefit from pursuing its expansion policy in both the short and long term. Key Words: Sustained long-term growth, excellent customer service, promote-from-within policy. Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Business, Operating and Expansion Strategies 3 Consistency in Strategy and Potential Changes 5 Current Performance and Keys to its Current Success 6 Competitors 7 Strouds 7 Lechters 8 JC Penney 8 Linens ‘n Things 8 Competitive Analysis 9 The Bargaining Power of Suppliers 9 Bargaining Power of Buyers 9 The Threat of New Entrants 9 Threat of Substitutes 9 Industry Rivalry 10 ROE and DuPont ratio analysis 10 3-Point DuPont Ratio 10 5-Point DuPont Ratio 10 ROE and growth rate 11 Strategic Considerations and Recommendation 12 References 13 Appendix A 14 Appendix B 14 Appendix C 14 Appendix D 15 Appendix E 15 Appendix F 15 Appendix G 16 Executive Summary Team United is an external independent consulting group hired by the board of directors of Bed Bath & Beyond (BBBY) to review and analyze the company’s business, operating, and expansion strategies. We......

Words: 3400 - Pages: 14

Free Essay

Investment

...method of calculation like part (f) except, we use return of another stock instead of return of market. Cov rs,rm= rS-rs(rm-rm) (n-1) (Step 2) The expected return predicted by CAPM is: ri=rf+βrm-rf The base assumption is that future expected return will be consistent with the historical data. Also, individual stocks’ expected error term, which is E(ei), is zero. Risk free rate=0.015. E(rm)=0.07188 ri=0.015+β(0.07188-0.015) Through these, we can get the following: | EBAY | ESRX | JACK | NDAQ | BBBY | S&P500 | rCAPM | 0.07849 | 0.06395 | 0.07492 | 0.09646 | 0.07159 | 0.07188 | (Step 3) The excess return of the market (S&P500) over the risk-free rate is the single factor in determining the excess returns of the stocks over the risk-free rate. So we can say ri-rf = ai+birm-rf+ei We used regression tool in excel to analyze the association with 95% confidence level. Below is the result of regression analysis. | EBAY | ESRX | JACK | NDAQ | BBBY | Intercept(ai) | -0.02628 | 0.02805 | 0.095811 | 0.050805 | 0.013813 | Factor loading(bi) | 1.116276 | 0.860603 | 1.053492 | 1.432134 | 0.994884 | t-stat | -0.25855 | 0.268479 | 0.953007 | 0.527283 | 0.182876 | Beta (step 1) | 1.116276 | 0.860603 | 1.053492 | 1.432134 | 0.994884 | t-stat | -0.25855 | 0.268479 | 0.953007 | 0.527283 | 0.182876 | Coefficient for x’s t-stat is bigger than absolute value of 2, meaning that linear relationship with market risk premium is positive. However, y......

Words: 1606 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Snapshot

...of their differentiated products. Be hindered: * Slow increasing rate with intensely competition. The maturity of the U.S. market. * Industry consolidation makes the large companies stronger, but LNT fall behind some big companies like BBBY. So it’s hard to catch up. * Financial crisis. * Government policies affect the industry performance. e.g. interest rate adjustment. High interest rate, low purchase. 3. How had Bed Bath & Beyond come to surpass Linens’n Thins over time despite its similar initial founding in the early 1970s (in terms of strategy and execution)? * BBBY expanded inventory, no debt and promoted only from within the company, while relying on store managers for inventory control. However, LNT just focus on increase market share. They didn’t care about the efficiency. * BBBY’s merchandising innovation was better than LNT’s. and more flexibility than LNT. 4. As a private equity, why did Apollo group acquire LNT? Is a private equity firm more likely to turn around LNT than a publicly traded firm (the pros and cons of public vs. private ownership)? Why did this acquisition fail? * The main reason is the low price for purchasing. It sold at $1.3 billion compared to BBBY $10.7 billion. * Apollo group believed that they can fix LNT’s problem and then run it or resell it to make profit. * A private equity firm is not more likely to turn around LNT than publicly traded firm. Because in order to fix LNT’s......

Words: 453 - Pages: 2