Free Essay

Felons Right to Bare Arms

In: Business and Management

Submitted By dariaculp2
Words 619
Pages 3
Felons’ Rights to Bare Arms

Felons’ Rights to Bare Arms

Felons’ Rights to Bare Arms

Why is it against the law for a felon to bare arms. The law applies to every criminal that served more than a year in prison ( the statute forbids not only “felons ‘ but any person convicted of “ a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year ‘ to posses a firearm or ammunition, whether the crime in question is classified as a felony or not. ). In my opinion this law should be reverse because most criminal offenders are non-violent ones and they do not have the right to defend themselves. What if a violent burglar breaks into their house and attempts to shoot them, they have no way of defending themselves ( I mean they could struggle for the gun but there I always that tiny risk of getting shot and they also could attempt to stab the burglar then they would go o jail for gun possession. I think that this law is just wrong and should be revaluated, to see if thee is some other way to allow these past offenders to bare arms. This is but just one example of the myraid collateral consequences faced by those who are convicted of a felony. Another right which felons lose is that of voting. I believe that in discussing both of these prohibitions, I agree with some other posters: that the particular crime for which someone was convicted is more important than whether the crime was a misdemeanor or a felony. For example, in some other State, if a person steals something whose value is $499, they can lawfully possess firearms and vote. However, if another person steals something whose value is $500, they cannot lawfully possess firearms or vote. So it is more or less an arbitrary demarcation. It exists because, at common law, there were significantly fewer crimes classified as felonies- they were very serious and all punishable by death. However, more crimes becomes felonies around the time blacks were given the right to vote and many state legislatures made crimes seen as black crimes felonies in order to disenfranchise as many black voters as possible. Anyway, I would say only violent felonies, such as murder, rape, assault, robbery, burglary, arson, mayhem, etc. ought to result in someone losing the rights to possess firearms.

Felons’ Rights to Bare Arms

Your point about the racist origins of many of ours laws, not the least of which include gun control laws, is well taken. But you have to draw the line somewhere. It may seem arbitrary, and to some extent it certainly is but you have to do something to delineate serious and less serious crimes. The problem is there are just to many if’s and’s, and but’s to be dealt wit. You have a million different laws each with a million different circumstances for a million different criminals. In the end there are just too many “what if’s” in every single law. And in the end, who would get to decide whether your robbery is violent or not? A government bureaucrat. While to some there is certainly an unjust outcome, it is much simpler and I believe overall more fair to just draw the line in the sand and say “If you cross this line, it’s a felony and here are the rights you are going to lose.” In the end it’s up to the criminal whether or not they decide to cross it and they should bear the responsibility of their actions. Not only that. But my handgun carry permit is one thing that immediately identifies me as law-abiding citizen to law enforcement officers during a traffic stop.…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Modest Proposal: Right to Bear Arms

...Monteith B6 February 20, 2013 2nd Amendment and the Right to Bear Arms When people here about mass killings involving fire arms, they automatically think it’s the guns fault. As if the gun fired on its own. This makes people think that our right to own fire arms should be taken away. Take a second and think about this, who was holding the gun? The majority of mass killings are done by someone that has a mental illness. We wouldn’t have to take away our right to bear arms if we figured out what to do about people with a mental illness. Schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and autism are the 3 main illnesses that the mass killers tend to have. Autism is usually detected early. Sometimes it is detected even before a child is born. Once it is figured out that a child will be autistic, they should be eliminated. This way we have taken out a potential threat to our community. The majority of schizophrenia cases are usually detected at the age 20. Bipolar disorder is normally diagnosed in teen years or early, most before the age of 25. Making it mandatory that every person at the age of 18 to be tested for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, whether they show symptoms or not, then every 2 years after that. Should someone refuse to get tested they would be sentenced to death. If a person should notice someone with symptoms before they are 18, they should contact local law enforcement so that the person is taken to get tested right away. Once a person is diagnosed with......

Words: 526 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

The Right to Keep and Bear Arms

...The Right to Keep and Bear Arms: A Right to Self-Defense Against Criminals and Despots by Robert Dowlut[*] If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. -- James Madison[1] INTRODUCTION A written constitution is a reminder that governments can be unreasonable and unjust. By guaranteeing that "[a] well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed," the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution provides the citizens a means of protection against the unjust excesses of government.[2] The Framers placed this guarantee in the Bill of Rights because they considered the right to keep and bear arms peculiarly important and also uniquely vulnerable to infringement. The Amendment's command protects individuals against even popular conceptions of the public good. In addition to this protection within the United States Constitution,[3] the constitutions of forty-three states guarantee the right to keep and bear arms.[4] Despite the constitutional authority for this right, legislators and judges have consistently attempted to devalue it. Methods such as giving misleading labels to select firearms like "assault weapons"[5] or "Saturday Night Specials"[6] have been used to justify incremental disarmament.[7] American jurisprudence has deliberately devalued the......

Words: 7782 - Pages: 32

Premium Essay

Fireman to Felon

...From Fireman to Felon PHI103: Informal Logic May 28, 2010 Most people think that Racism is a thing of the past. Well for the most part they are correct. In everyday life, racism has decreased to little more than an odd event here or there. Sometimes you will hear on the news about a racially motivated crime. Did you know that you could be charged with a hate crime if you are fighting with a person of another race and you call them a derogatory name. That is grounds for charges being brought against you for a hate crime. But long gone are the days when you had crosses burning and lynchings. Thanks to Abraham Lincoln the fifth president of the United States and the first voice of the slaves. There is still one place that racism runs rampant and that is the Prison System. .. Every day you can bear witness to racism inside America’s Prison System. can Americans in Prison in New Jersey think that white people are racist, they would always ask, “are you racist”. Because most of the Caucasions in prison join a white supremacy gang, the whites are labeled as racist because that is the gangs a majority join. But what about the God Bodies in New Jersey. They are racist to their very tenants and principals, because they believe the white man is the devil. And that each one of them is a God. They call the Corrections Officers Crackers and Honky. They justify this by saying that the White Officers are in the KKK. Most African Americans think that the reason......

Words: 1418 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Is the Right to Bear Arms Ethical

...Senior Research Project: Is the right to bear arms ethical? Lucas Van Duyn Senior Seminar: Business Ethics Dr. Jewe July 31, 2012 Introduction to the Project: In the United States, research into firearms and violent crime is fraught with difficulties, associated with limited data on gun ownership and use, firearms markets, and aggregation of crime data. Research studies into gun violence have primarily taken one of two approaches: case-control studies and social ecology. Gun ownership is usually determined through surveys, proxy variables, and sometimes with production and import figures. In statistical analysis of homicides and other types of crime, which are rare events, these data tend to have poison distributions, which also presents methodological challenges to researchers. (Just Facts, 2010) Americans own an estimated 270 million firearms, approximately 90 guns for every 100 people. In 2009, guns took the lives of 31,347 Americans in homicides, suicides and unintentional shootings. This is the equivalent of more than 85 deaths each day and more than three deaths each hour. 66,769 Americans were treated in hospital emergency departments for non-fatal gunshot wounds in 2009. Firearms were the third-leading cause of injury-related deaths nationwide in 2009, following poisoning and motor vehicle accidents. Between 1955 and 1975, the Vietnam War killed over 58,000 American soldiers – less than the number of civilians killed with guns in the U.S. in an......

Words: 10549 - Pages: 43

Premium Essay

Arms

...2013 SUBJECT:   Summary of the Army White Paper: A Profession of Arms 1.   Purpose:   To summarize the Army White Paper: A Profession of Arms and capture the thesis, main points, and objective of the writer. 2.   Facts: a. The author notes the purpose of his writing in the beginning prologue, “This White Paper serves to facilitate an Army-wide dialog about our Profession of Arms.   It is neither definitive nor authoritative, but a starting point with which to begin discussion.”   He alludes to future refinement of the paper once TRADOC receives feedback from the Army community. b. Organized into five sections, A Profession of Arms begins by defining “Profession” and its implications to the Army.   The paper then delves into the Army’s “Professional Culture,” before discussing the effects of “Army Ethics” in developing that culture.   Lastly, it analyzes the role of U.S. society in the development of Army ethics and culture.   The paper concludes with possible future changes in the meaning “Profession of Arms” after a decade of war and a request to begin a community dialogue on this topic. c. To start the discussion, the author defines Profession when he states, “Professions produce uniquely expert work, not routine or repetitive work.”   He continues by describing truly expert work as taking years of study and practice.   The writer transitions into how the Army is an “American Profession of Arms, a vocation comprised of experts certified in the ethical......

Words: 619 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Felon Voting

...Felon Voting In the United States, people convicted with felony are barred from participating in voting in any election. According to Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law (2008), it is estimated that about five million felony victims have been denied this chance, a condition referred to as disenfranchisement. Every state in America has its own law concerning disenfranchisement. Felons are only allowed to vote in Maine and Vermont states (Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, 2008). Some states demand that felon re-enfranchisement should be enhanced to allow felons who have already completed their sentence to participate in elections. They argue that their privileges and rights should be restored by allowing them to cast votes. According to them, blocking felons from voting is undemocratic, unfair, racially, and politically motivated while opponents state that felons have poor judgment, and should not be entrusted with this fundamental right. This research paper gives a clear summary of two articles concerning their position on felon voting. The first article is Liberal and republication argument against the disenfranchisement of felons by Jeffrey Reiman, and the second one is Locked out: felon disenfranchisement and America democracy by Jeff Manza and Christopher Uggen. Both articles indicate that disenfranchisement of criminal offenders who are already through with their sentences is ethically and morally wrong. The two authors lobby for the......

Words: 1574 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Right to Bear Arms

...Right to Bear Arms and The Second Amendment October 20, 2010 Should only the criminals be allowed to own guns that they buy from the Black-market? Ask yourself this question next time you vote. A coalition of gun control groups and some politicians are trying to get the Second Amendment changed so that millions of Americans can’t and won’t be able to own guns legally in the United States. The Second Amendment reads: A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. The number of well-publicized public shootings during the past few years, especially the tragedy at Columbine High School, has re-energized the gun control movement. As a show of strength coalition of gun control groups have organized many protests. These types of events are designed to stir up emotions rather than promote rational thought. And when one looks at the facts about gun control, it's easy to see why the anti-gun lobby relies on emotion rather than logic to make its case. Some of their facts are: Thousands of children die annually in gun accidents. Actually the truth is that gun accidents involving children are actually at record lows, although you wouldn't know it from listening to the mainstream media. In 2008, the last year for which data are available, only 142 children under 15 years of age died in gun accidents, and the total number of gun-related deaths for this age group was 642. More......

Words: 1138 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Right to Bear Arms

...are a distraction to the reader. Thank you, Karen The Right to Bear Arms November 2012 Right to Bear Arms The right to bear arms is the Second Amendment to the Constitution, stating that the people of the United States shall have the right to keep and bear arms and this right will not be infringed. “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (Coia, 2010). This right has been an issue in many court systems for many years. Court systems have said it is to the discretion of the state to uphold this right. Many states have passed that it is illegal for a convicted criminal to to own or possess a fire arm. Also, court systems have said, that you may posses a fire arm even if you are not part of a militia. For many years now, the Second Amendment right has been under much debate. Is it the right for individuals to own a fire arm or is it to ensure that the militias continue to succeed? In 2008, District of Columbia vs Heller, the court has determined that the Second Amendment gave individuals the right to posses a handgun in their homes for protection. This case had left many questions unanswered, mainly whether or not the Second Amendment affected state and local law or only the federal government. In 2010, in the case of McDonald vs the City of Chicago, the court decided that the Second Amendment right did affected the power of state government. Even with......

Words: 2022 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Bare

...(contains) elastic tissue to stretch and recoil to help expel air; [5] 48. (i) oxygen is used in respiration; carbon dioxide is released ( in respiration); carbon dioxide is absorbed (by soda lime); 2 (ii) vital capacity; 1 [3] 49. (blood flows) twice through the heart / AW; for one circuit / cycle (of the whole body) / AW; A for one heart beat ref pulmonary and systemic systems / to lungs and to (rest of) body; R systematic max 2 [2] 50. (i) D right atrium E right ventricle F left ventricle 3 (ii) provides more, force / pressure, to pump blood around body; longer distance compared with distance right ventricle has to pump blood; or right atrium; AVP; e.g. detail of pulmonary circulation accept letters D, E and F if used in place of names of chambers of heart max 3 [6] 51. iron / Fe; four / 4; Bohr, effect / shift; carbonic anhydrase; haemoglobinic acid; A reduced haemoglobin A HHb [5] 52. (a) water uptake / AW; R water used 1 (b) 1 cut (healthy) shoot under water (to stop air entering xylem vessels); 2 cut shoot at a slant (to increase surface area); 3 check apparatus is......

Words: 15986 - Pages: 64

Premium Essay

Right to Bear Arms

...the security of a free state, the right of people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” Our Founding Fathers believed that governments are prone to use soldiers to oppress the people. History had suggested that this risk could be controlled by permitting the government to raise armies (consisting of full-time paid troops) only when needed to fight foreign enemies. “We established however some, although not all its (self-government) important principles. The constitutions of most of our states assert, that all power is inherent in the people; that they exercise it by themselves, in all cases to which they think themselves competent; (as in electing their functionaries executive and legislative, and deciding by a jury of themselves, in all judiciary cases in which any fact is involved,) or may they act by representatives, freely and equally chosen that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed” (Jefferson). Gun control has been a highly controversial issue for decades. A vast majority of Americans believe that if gun control is strictly enforced it would quickly reduce the threat of crime. Many innocent people feel they have the right to bear arms for protection, or even just the pleasure of recreational sports, such as hunting. Americans have a constitutional right to own hand guns. Although, stricter laws and licensing may not affectively abolish crime, it will help to make it more challenging for anyone to purchase fire arms. Currently the federal law......

Words: 1227 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Felons Should Be Able to Vote

...denied. These American citizens, who are also felons, are being denied the right to vote due to disenfranchisement laws. In the United States, “Two states, Vermont and Maine, allow convicted felons to vote while in prison. Nine states permanently restrict certain felons from voting (until and if granted the state governor's pardon) even if those people have served their prison sentence, parole, probation, and paid all fines. The remaining 36 states fall somewhere in between,” (ProCon.org, 2009). Felons should have the right to vote, as they have paid or are paying their debt to society, and the millions of missing felony votes impact all of us. How many times have you voted in a close race and your candidate did not win? Imagine if just a fraction of the felons that share your views were allowed to vote just like they are allowed to pay taxes. Millions of Americans in our republic are not represented at every election due to non-felony voting, which can be said to be undemocratic, and as such, felons should be allowed to vote in all states. “The legislature has sent a clear message that voting is a fundamental right that should not be stripped away from people who are working, paying taxes and contributing to their communities, “said Steven Brown, Executive Director of the ACLU of Rhode Island. According to the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, the right of citizens of the United States to vote is a fundamental right. An author from the New York Times......

Words: 865 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Bare Bones

...  Bare Bones    Revision Guide AQA A2 Business Studies Unit 4 The Business Environment & Managing Change y y lic po ar e h th ow gr ar et on m y ion lic o yp t ec ot tive pr pec t s st n o em ti un xa idy ta ubs s c e l se w s po ket ies ar eg e m at g str ad y c s tr gin te er ra oli ver ersment n of emorpo m l p o rg ploy xatio ts ke e cl er ers n m lder p yme u ns keho plo a co n io t fla in g lin r e ng hao a ke c eed c a m fis t objectives t fr d men aims an ic environnment m econo enviro ment social nviron ange h legal e e em un ta of c causes ship leader g and proc hange g for c ess entin implem ing change s manag decision plannin rship exch st rates intere tives objecg markets in g emerg tion inflaange rates cto phic fa nemp subsid taxa hea u n envirot l M e ade s on na a n gi ra demog al dec politic ow ons er su n c C change i nfl subunemployateion men si m nt t re gula dy tio p an h envir social u lea ence ns d s fisc ersh al p i olic p y ge leade e cultur nt onme leg al inte stra rnal c teg au infl ic decisio ses enviro n missio tec al envir ecisio nt ra hno onm ns logi ent po cal or c strategi es influenc ent nm ...

Words: 27143 - Pages: 109

Free Essay

The Right to Bear Arms

...The Right to Bear Arms Katie Bruner BCOM275 January 4, 2011 Christine Taylor Doctor's Asking About Guns in the Home Recently the discussion on the radio was about pediatricians asking parents about firearms in the household. I found an article with basic pros and cons to this subject. Law are put into place to keep the public safe, but sometimes those law start to step on the toes of Americans’ rights. Is it really necessary for my pediatrician to ask me about my gun collection or if I even have one? The Second Amendment is a powerful one, but people are making it difficult for any ordinary citizen to enjoy this right. According to (Constitution.org, 10/1), the Second Amendment to the Bill of Rights says, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” (Constitution.org, 11/2) says “The militia, when properly formed, is in fact the people themselves….all men capable of bearing arms.” The Second Amendment was ultimately formed so that the government cannot become too strong and overpower the people. This means anyone in America has the right to bear arms. Now I understand the need to put some regulation on this right for obvious reasons. But what I do not understand is what having a gun has to do with my children’s well baby check-ups. When reading this article Kids and Guns: Why Doctors Have a Right to Know, it say how a pediatrician told the......

Words: 665 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Social Justice for Felons in Kentucky

...Imagine yourself walking out of prison in Kentucky, after serving your sentence that society has deemed relevant, into a world that will deprive you of your basic constitutional rights. One night as a young, immature adult, while partying with friends you mistakenly got into a car that unbeknownst to you had been stolen. Unfortunately, you and the other occupants of the car were pulled over by the state police; you and the others were cited with theft of unlawful taking. Because the car was worth over $10,000, you were charged with a felony offense, and sentenced to 5 years in prison. Even though you weren’t satisfied with the sentence or the system, you decided to chalk it up to bad luck and serve your time. As you walk out of prison, you are excited to return to your life and family; however, little do you know in the state of Kentucky you will basically be living in a prison with no bars. This is social injustice. When I hear the words social injustice I think of equality, civil rights, suffrage, struggles, and ultimately peace. In my opinion, social justice is the natural and fair distribution of goods and services to all members of society no matter what your age, race, sex, or sexual preference happens to be. Social justice does not discriminate; it advocates and allows for a good quality of life for all. According to the National Association of Social Worker’s code of ethics, social work is a profession that strives for social justice by challenging social......

Words: 1377 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

The Right to Bear Arms

...The Right to Bear Arms Gun control has been a controversial issue for many years. A vast majority of citizens believe that if gun control is strictly enforced it would quickly reduce the threat of crime. Many innocent people feel they have the right to bear arms for protection, or even just the pleasure of hunting. Americans have a constitutional right to own hand guns and stricter laws and licensing will not affectively save lives. The second amendment states “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” The Founding Fathers included this in the Bill of Rights because they feared the Federal Government might oppress the population if the people did not have the means to defend themselves as a nation or individuals. “We established however some, although not all its (self-government) important principles. The constitutions of most of our states assert, that all power is inherent in the people; that they exercise it by themselves, in all cases to which they think themselves competent; (as in electing their functionaries executive and legislative, and deciding by a jury of themselves, in all judiciary cases in which any fact is involved,) or may they act by representatives, freely and equally chosen that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed” (Jefferson). It is believed that The Founding Fathers thought that the society benefited......

Words: 1360 - Pages: 6