Free Essay

Nsa Ethics of Mass Surveillance

In: Philosophy and Psychology

Submitted By safiron1995
Words 1335
Pages 6
The Ethics of the NSA Mass-Surveillance Program
University Name
Student Name
Course Number/Name
Professor Name
Date

Introduction One of the most explosive scandals of the 21st century was involved the National Security Agency (NSA), and the revelations that the agency had set up a robust, warrantless mass surveillance program in the years after the 9/11 attacks. Designed to pick up bits of intelligence that could be used in order to thwart future 9/11 attacks, critics of the program argued that not only was it unconstitutional given the lack of warrants obtained prior to engaging in the program, but that it was ineffective at stopping any kind of real terrorism. Supporters pushed back that the program was an essential tool for fighting terrorists who had become more advanced digitally, often using the internet in order to communicate with each other. Much of the discussion on the program related to the ethical appropriateness of the NSA’s activities. This paper will summarize the NSA’s surveillance program and discuss it from the perspective of utilitarianism and Kantian ethics; in addition, the paper will discuss the author’s personal viewpoint of the program.
Summary of the Program The NSA spying program, named the “Terrorist Surveillance Program” by the New York Times, focused on monitoring the communications of between 500 and 1000 people within the United States with suspected ties to Al-Qaeda (Dunn, 2015). Many of these individuals were American citizens, and no warrants were obtained prior to spying on them. The method of spying was to use technology in order to gain access to metadata which could then be keyword searched by NSA analysts in order to find suspect topics. The NSA installed fiber optic splitters in key data junctions throughout the United States, totaling between 10 and 20 data junctions (Lawson, 2008). These fiber optic splitters gave the NSA access to billions of emails without the knowledge of the senders. Similarly, the data splitters could gain access to phone calls and phone numbers of millions of unsuspecting Americans. This data was subsequently analyzed using the Naurus Semantic Traffic Analyzer, which essentially key word searched metadata in order to find terrorist related patterns and topics which could then be used as evidence to focus on individuals more closely (Dunn, 2015). This data gathering and analysis was conducted with no oversight, with no warrants provided.
Applying Utilitarianism A first ethical theory that is pertinent to this case is utilitarianism. This ethical perspective argues that the ethical nature of a decision is based on the ultimate outcome associated with the choices made, rather than the choices themselves (Shaw, 2016). In essence, utilitarianism can be summed up by the phrase “the ends justify the means”. Proponents of this theory argue that if an action is taken that appears unethical in the process, this does not necessarily mean that the actions are unethical; it can only be judged based on the outcome. A simple example of utilitarianism is seen in harvesting an organ from a criminal in order to save a person who then goes on to cure cancer. On the surface, stealing an organ from anyone would appear unethical, but in this case the ultimate outcome saves millions, thus making the action ethical. Utilitarianism is the ethical theory that tends to be preferred by proponents of the NSA’s Terrorist Surveillance Program. The belief is that if the surveillance program is able to stop a terrorist attack before it occurs, it will save lives. As such, the outcome of the surveillance program is ethical, even though the process of mass surveillance tramples on the Constitution of the United States, and the concept that the government needs to seek a warrant prior to beginning to conduct surveillance on an American citizen. This is a sacred duty that the American government has to its citizens, something that is enshrined in the Fourth Amendment which bars the government from engaging in illegal searches and seizures in pursuit of a criminal investigation (Dunn, 2015). A believer in utilitarianism would argue that the lives of American citizens are more important than adhering to a legal principle which demands a specific process be followed. Saving lives is seen as the ethical choice, superior to following the Constitution.
Applying Kantian Ethics Traditionally, the ethical theory that is the diametric opposite of utilitarianism is Kantian ethics. Developed by Emmanuel Kant, this ethical theory holds that ethical rightness or wrongness is not determined by the outcome of actions, but by the ability of the decision maker to adhere to their duty (Shaw, 2016). The foundation of this theory is that it is virtually impossible to control the ultimate outcome of events, and a person should always be in control of whether or not they are making ethical choices. In this way, the theory holds that a person can always adhere to their duty, as long as they are aware of their duty and have the moral fiber to follow that duty no matter what. In this way, the means are what determines the ethical nature of a choice, rather than the ends. Just as the proponents of the Terrorist Surveillance Program use utilitarianism as their ethical theory to support moving forward with the mass surveillance tactics, critics of the program ground their ethical disapproval in Kantian ethics. In the perspective of critics of the program, the government’s main duty is to uphold the Constitution of the United States. As the supreme law of the land, the Constitution is the guiding document which the entire American legal and political systems are based on. Many top government officials, including the President of the United States (who signed off on the NSA’s surveillance programs), swear an oath to uphold the Constitution (Dunn, 2015). It is very clear that the primary duty that the federal government and its agents have is to upholding the Constitution, and the argument follows that failing to obtain a warrant prior to gathering surveillance on American citizens (as the NSA program does to an enormous degree) is a violation of that duty, and is therefore an unethical choice under Kantian ethics.
My Perspective My position is that the NSA surveillance program is flagrantly unethical as it completely tears up the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution, one of the federal government’s most sacred duties and obligations to its citizens. The semantic gymnastics aside, the NSA is quite clearly engaging in illegal searches against American citizens, since they have not obtained warrants prior to beginning the program. Perhaps as importantly, I object to the NSA spying program on a pragmatic basis. So far, there has been little evidence that the program has been successful in stopping any terrorist attacks, despite being in place for over a decade. The 9/11 attacks were not successful because the federal government did not have enough information; the 9/11 Commission noted that there was tremendous amounts of information about each of the terrorists, but the pieces were not put together by authorities (Dunn, 2015). The NSA surveillance program is a perfect example of the federal government using a legitimate crisis in order to expand its power through illegitimate means.
Conclusion
The NSA’s Terrorist Surveillance Program uses technology to suck up metadata, which is analyzed to find patterns with regard to terrorism. A perspective based in utilitarianism would hold that this is ethical, since it helps save lives. A perspective rooted in Kantian ethics argues that this is unethical, as it violates the American government’s duty to the Constitution. For my part, I do not believe that this program is either ethical or particularly useful, and I think it should be eliminated immediately.

References
Dunn, W. J. (2015). The Constitutional Infirmity of Warrantless NSA Surveillance: The Abuse of Presidential Power and the Injury to the Fourth Amendment. William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 15, 147-202.
Lawson, G. (2008). What Lurks Beneath: NSA Surveillance and Executive Power. BUL Rev., 88, 375.
Shaw, W. (2016). Business ethics: A textbook with cases. Cengage Learning.…...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Nsa Surveillance Program

...NSA Surveillance Program Eric D. Reeves ITT Tech Online MG517 – Ethical and Regulatory Environment Dr. Carrie A. O'Hare June 9, 2013 Abstract/Executive Summary The American people are reaping what they sow.  They were so eager to have any semblance of security after 9/11, that they allowed the Patriot Act to be rammed through Congress and signed into law all in a matter of days despite warnings from critics that it could be used to infringe upon citizens’ rights. NSA Surveillance Program has been in the news over the past week.  It was revealed Wednesday June 5, 2013 in The Guardian that the NSA had requested the phone records of millions of Version’s customers regardless of whether they were suspected of suspicious activity or not. In addition it seems that other carriers are requesting similar information. * Introduction: This week millions of Americans was informed by The Guardian of a top-secret government order that was approved by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, requiring that Verizon release and hand over millions of Americans’ phone records to the national Security Agency. Of course this information made many Americans uncomfortable and people started freaking out. Then the Washington Post reported that not only has the government been keeping an eye on whom we call, when, and how long we talk to them, but it’s also been tapping into the servers of nine major U.S. Internet companies and collecting emails, photos, videos, documents, and...

Words: 2521 - Pages: 11

Free Essay

Nsa Dilemma

...NSA-Het dilemma Tot voor kort, en wellicht nog steeds, heeft de Verenigde Staten verscheidene apparaten ‘afgetapt’. Aftappen; door middel van het plaatsen van afluisterapparatuur informatie verkrijgen uit gesprekken die andere mensen voeren. Legaal of illegaal? Privacy schending of veiligheid? Er rijzen veel onbeantwoorde vragen na de openbaring van Edward Snowden over de vage zaakjes binnen zijn ex-baan, oftewel de afluisterpraktijken van de NSA. Velen onder ons hebben een negatief beeld bij het begrip spionage. Maar niet alle spionage is slecht Met het aftappen van telefoongesprekken kan de NSA namelijk wel grote rampen voorkomen. Pas op het moment dat het verzamelen van data ongelimiteerd wordt, wordt het gevaarlijk. Met terugwerkende kracht kunnen wij, de burgers, de activiteiten van de NSA reconstrueren. Klokkenluider Snowden heeft duidelijk gemaakt dat dit onbeperkt verzamelen van data nu gaande is. Sommigen zien hem als een persoon die codes verbroken heeft, die zijn land verraden heeft. ‘Hij heeft de Constitutie verraden. De VS zijn niet gesticht om een 29-jarige in zijn eentje te laten beslissen over wat openbaar moet worden gemaakt.’ Anderen zien hem als een held. ‘Snowden geeft alles op, staat voor zijn daad en beschermt zijn omgeving. Dan ben je een ware held.’ Waar hebben we het over? In plaats van nadenken over het daadwerkelijke probleem, de NSA en haar verzwegen feiten, hebben we het over Snowden, of hij het de wereld wel in had moeten brengen. We moeten......

Words: 417 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Surveillance: a Double Edged Sword

...Surveillance: A Double Edged Sword As citizens of a free nation our constitution has granted us certain basic rights. The expectation from preservers of law and order is that they will help us to exercise and enjoy these powers. Security from threats is another expectation that we demand from the keepers of law. Obviously, in order to provide us security from outside threat the law keepers need to exercise some special powers and the basics of that is “Surveillance”. Surveillance in ordinary language means “the close inspection of a suspect”. To conduct the Surveillance there are different ways & most commonly used ways include the monitoring of telephone records, spy camera, email and newly and most recent way is through digital media. Now the question arises that if surveillance is being conducted does it not comprise with the basic rights for national that is the “privacy”? The NSA and other agencies has produced some occurrences that clearly shows that it has some time stepped over the line and violated the privacy of nationals. The age of digital media justifies this yet people have other view. This makes the Surveillance a double edged sword hanging on the citizens. They can’t deny it yet they can’t take it. The problem In age of technological development you can never be sure that who is keeping a eye on us. The security agencies give a valid explanation that it is their duty to provide the security to the nation and so they need to perform these actions. The......

Words: 577 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Nsa Surveillance Under Obama Administration

...The former director of the US National Security Agency has indicated that surveillance programs have "expanded" under Barack Obama's time in office and said the spy agency has more powers now than when he was in command. Michael Hayden, who served most of his tenure as NSA director under George W Bush, said there was "incredible continuity" between the two presidents. Advertisement Hayden's comments came as the debate around the extent of government surveillance in the US and the UK intensified on Sunday. In Washington, some US senators demanded more transparency from the Obama administration. Libertarian Republican Rand Paul said he wanted to mount a supreme court challenge. The British foreign secretary, William Hague, announced he would make a statement to parliament on Monday after the Guardian revealed that UK intelligence agencies used the US Prism system to generate intelligence reports. Hague said it was "fanciful" and "nonsense" to suggest that the British monitoring service, GCHQ, would work with an agency in another country to circumvent restrictions on surveillance in the UK. Advertisement The issue dominated the Sunday talk shows on both sides of the Atlantic. On CNN, senator Mark Udall, one of the prominent Senate critics of US government surveillance, called for amendments to the Patriot Act, the controversial law brought in after the 9/11 attacks, to rein in the NSA's powers. "I'm calling for reopening the Patriot Act," Udall said. "The......

Words: 345 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Surveillance in Schools

...Surveillance Surveillance in Schools: Safety vs. Personal Privacy A project created by Kathy Davis, John Kelsey, Dia Langellier, Misty Mapes, and Jeff Rosendahl Project Home Security Cameras Metal Detectors Locker Searches Internet Tracking “Surveillance…n. close observation, esp. of a suspected person” [emphasis added] --Reader’s Digest Oxford Complete Wordfinder, 1996 In 1995, “The total number of crimes committed per year in or near the 85,000 U.S. public schools has been estimated at around 3 million” (Volokh & Snell, 1998). Our educational system is evolving all the time, and one factor that is constantly changing is the aggressiveness within our schools. In 1940, a survey of teachers revealed that the biggest behavioral problems they had from students were “talking out of turn, chewing gum, making noise, running in the halls, cutting in line, [violating] the dress code, [and] littering” (Volokh & Snell, 1998). In 1990, the toprated problems were “drug abuse, alcohol abuse, pregnancy, suicide, rape, robbery, [and] assault” (Volokh & Snell, 1998). In 1940, we had little need for surveillance beyond a teacher’s observation and intervention. Today, however, we live in a much more diverse society with troubled youth and adults who have easy access to weapons, drugs, pornography, etc., which have enabled students and staff to bring their violent and/or inappropriate tendencies into the naïve schools. What worked in 1940 (teacher-student confrontation) is not as......

Words: 17490 - Pages: 70

Free Essay

Nsa Spy Programs

...faxes, phone calls, and web traffic- especially those dispatched over long distances.[2] The term Echelon has never actually been mentioned by officials, but is believed to represent the computer system that manages the data gathered by the network.[3] The computers are used to store and analyze text data for key words, and to review telephone conversations for unique ‘voiceprints’ or the phone numbers of persons under surveillance.[4] This makes it possible to filter an enormous amount of traffic, since human analysts review only relevant messages. The US National Security Agency (NSA) is widely considered to be both the originator and head of the project, and likely owns and operates the major computer facilities for Echelon. Original and Current Purpose Initially, the system was intended to intercept and analyze all manner of communications from East Bloc countries. Emphasis was placed on messages with military, political, or economic information- in that order of importance. Even before the dissolution of the Soviet Union, intelligence services like the NSA were turning their eyes inward- toward potential troublemakers within friendly territory. While Echelon is still used to spy on former Soviet countries, it is now also used to listen in on the conversations of allies- possibly including UKUSA member nations. The system has been continually upgraded and expanded despite the disappearance of the original threat.[5] What is Suspected? Potential......

Words: 5284 - Pages: 22

Premium Essay

Internet Surveillance

...government agencies and corporations, but also hackers willing to risk a prison sentence. In 2013, NSA whistle blower Edward Snowden revealed previously unknown details of global surveillance programs run by the United States' NSA in close cooperation with three partners: Australia, the United Kingdom, and Canada. The documents leaked by Mr. Snowden revealed details about the NSA secretly tapping into Yahoo and Google data centers to collect information from millions of accounts worldwide. The shocking evidenced released by Mr. Snowden reveals that lawmakers and politicians should take greater control over how and why they are using their surveillance technologies, and question whether or not the fight against terrorism justifies the use of these surveillance programs on citizens as well. Furthermore, it is important to ensure that there be continued innovation in internet security in order to create services and products which can counter-act the use of these programs on ordinary citizens who don’t want their data accessible to anyone but themselves. Spying agencies are able to cripple the civil liberties and the right to privacy of citizens, therefore it is imperative that the government protect the rights of citizens through reforms on Surveillance Acts, but it is also equally pertinent for citizens take initiative and push for new reforms and innovation in online security. Surveillance is defined as the “monitoring of people and systems in order to regulate their......

Words: 1527 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Nsa Eavesdropping and Data Mining

...NSA Eavesdropping and Data Mining Table of Contents Abstract..........................................................................................................3 Introduction....................................................................................................4 Literature Review............................................................................................6 Discussion.......................................................................................................13 Conclusion......................................................................................................15 References.......................................................................................................17 Abstract Technology is constantly around us and from this point forward it is never going away not that most of us can remember a time without cell phones but for some of us we can still recall a time when it didn’t exist. Eavesdropping has been a complex endeavor and has been evolving over the years from placing a listening device which had a built in microphone and a short distance transmitter. Now it is complex algorithms that can when completely decrypted give a person or an organization complete information on a person and allow them access into a private life. I say private life when in all actuality we seem to be more responsive to sharing everything with everyone in fact it is a lack of anonymity and of a global......

Words: 4920 - Pages: 20

Free Essay

Surveillance

...Roberto Cruz Professor Ibach English 104 April 28, 2015 Surveillance Many forms of surveillance have always existed as people watch over others for mutual care, for moral caution, and to figure out information secretly. If one has nothing to hide, then they have nothing to worry about. When one is in a public space, he/she is in the eye of the public. So what’s the difference in being watched by a closed circuit TV camera and being seen in public? Even if one is caught doing something embarrassing, the police will not arrest him/her and no surveillance officer will put an individual on national television. Surveillance does enhance our society for there are many advantages in having surveillance. Surveillance provides safety for a community, it can deter crime, and it catches many things that an individual doesn’t catch. Surveillance provides safety for a community. Surveillance cameras in public places ensures public safety. ToughEfrain26, a poll survey taker on Debate.org, states that “Surveillance cameras would to a safer public environment, by providing surveillance at times, and in areas where law officials cannot be present.” An individual will rarely attempt to harm another person when he/she is aware that his/her actions are being recorded on camera. Cameras keep an individual safe. Jonathan Sparco, a platinum level expert author for Enzine Articles, states that “A residential security system is becoming more and more important due to the increasing......

Words: 1094 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Spying of the Nsa, Public Speaking Report

...Spying of the NSA The past year we all have heard of the NSA spying through social media, phones and all sorts of stuff, we heard of this because of Edward Snowden, an ex CIA- system analyst. He exposed their spying and this has resulted in to a global issue. Because the spying is wrong on so many levels we are here to convince you that what the NSA is doing is wrong. *attention grabber* So now that I have your attention I will continue. Main Point 1: How is it possible that the NSA is spying on civilians? Sub Point 1: What is the NSA; I’m going to begin by telling you a little about what the NSA is. The NSA better known as the National Security Agency is the main producer and manager of the signals intelligence for the United States. The NSA is responsible for the protection of U.S. government. The NSA is tasked with monitoring on targeted individuals in the U.S. But the NSA doesn’t just spy on targeted individuals; they spy on every U.S. citizen, they even spy on world leaders. They can spy on anyone around the world, and they can do this through social media, the internet and phones. I will explain this in more detail later. Ok so now that I’ve talked about what the NSA is, I will tell you guys how it is possible that the NSA is spying on us. Well to begin, the NSA spying program started back when George Bush was the president of the United States, the spying started right after nine eleven, this was in 2001 and that is 13 years ago so consider how long they......

Words: 1852 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Electronic Surveillance

...Ethics in the Government and Public Sector in Electronic Surveillance “Can you hear me now, Yes I can even see you” Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Abstract In todays society the number of computers, tablets, mobile devices will rise to about 65 billion devices connecting to the internet. That not counting vehicles, household applicances, gaming devices. However, with all of these deveices there is a significant benfit that will make our lives easier and one potential theat that invades our privacy called Geolocational Privacy and Surveillance (GPS). This sometimes hidden or masked feature is colleting our personal information, location and sometimes converstation. Laws have have enmpowered government and companies to collect databases of consumers without our consent. With ongoing technology where does the protection beging and the surveillance stop. Ethics in the Government and Public Sector in Electronic Surveillance In the movie Enemy of the State the lawyer played by Will Smith becomes a target by a corrupt politican who kills a congressman for his unwillingness to help with a new surveillance system with satellites. The politican with the help of National Security Aministration agents to destroy the lawyers life by manipulation thru the internet and surveillance. This movie was produced in 1998 and then the technological devices we have now were not that advanced. Little did we know that would become the norm of everyday life of those who......

Words: 1919 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Nsa Surveillance

...Sharath Thomas Professor Hugetz ENGL 1301.08 05 April 2016 NSA Surveillance - Constitutional or Unconstitutional The US Constitution came to life 230 years ago, but recent actions of the National Security Agency is interpreted to be defying the Bill of Rights by the government and depriving the citizens their constitutional right to privacy. However, when posed with the question: Do people want to live in a surveillanced environment like animals in a zoo, with justice and safety ensured but privacy denied completely ? , the answers vary in the community. The revelation of the National Security Agency's massive surveillance of American citizens has prompted a debate about the constitutionality of the agency's actions. The policies of the the National Security Agency is said to be conflicting with the basic right of privacy guaranteed to citizens in the Fourth Amendment. The "metadata" collection carried out by the National Security Agency, including all kinds of personal records and assets along with a list of phone calls and electronic messages poses a challenge to the Fourth Amendment of the Bill of Rights. Eavesdropping on people is a loaded feature of NSA: " It specializes in pretty much one thing, and that's eavesdropping on communications around the world, whether it's e-mail, cell phones, regular telephones--any kind of communications--and......

Words: 1025 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Nsa: Surveillance Awareness Project Proposal

...Surveillance Awareness Project A proposal prepared by Team Underachievers Shea Polansky Gabriela Cde Baca Jacob Nevarez Elliot Nicholas For Dr. Natasha Jones University of New Mexico 2014-10-21 Team Underachievers Memo TO:​​Dr. Natasha Jones FROM:​Team Underachievers DATE:​​2014-10-7 SUBJECT:​Proposal PURPOSE:​To acquaint you with our proposal Dear Dr. Jones, Edward Snowden’s leaks about the National Security Agency’s mass surveillance programs created a global debate about privacy, security, and safety. The NSA has the capability to read email, snoop on private social network conversations, observe phone call records, and track the physical locations of citizens not charged nor suspected of any crime, without so much as a warrant. Worse, the demographic most affected this level of snooping on our digital lives, the 18-24 year-old college crowd, is the least knowledgeable and most politically apathetic about the issue. This is a recipe for disaster, and this proposal seeks funding for an awareness campaign that will address it. This campaign will raise awareness about mass surveillance and the Snowden disclosures. We will use posters and flyers to dry attention to the issue. We will use the University of New Mexico as a testing ground, using before and after surveys to gauge effectiveness. If the campaign proves successful, we will recruit volunteers and raise a second round of funding to bring the campaign to college campuses......

Words: 3481 - Pages: 14

Free Essay

Nsa Surveillance Program

...NSA Surveillance Program The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) was created in 1978 as a response to past presidential abuses of massive domestic wiretapping and surveillance that were conducted by the National Security Agency (NSA) on many innocent Americans. FISA was designated to limit warrantless foreign intelligence surveillance for national security purposes and to issue the extent to which NSA could seize domestic communications. An executive power would need a warrant approved by FISA and only for the cases where the sole intention for the surveillance was to obtain foreign intelligence information (Skalski 15). Things changed shortly after the September 11 terrorist attacks in 2001 when President Bush secretly gave authorization to the NSA to wiretap Americans on the US soil without a warrant from FISA. By the same year, the Bush Administration passed the Patriotic Act that enabled FBI to demand the sharing of “any tangible things sought relevant to an authorized investigation” (Barnett 4), including strictly domestic records. Also, three days after the terrorist attacks, the Congress passed AUMF (Authorization for Use of Military Force) Act that was a necessity, but it was wrongly used by the Bush Administration as the reason of permission for the massive spying program. Because of the secrecy of these surveillance transmissions, the American public had no idea of the existence of......

Words: 2180 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Business Ethics Paper on Employee Surveillance

...Business Ethics Paper March 4th, 2012 Rasmussen College Business Ethics Professor De La Cruz Brian Meld Business Ethics Paper Imagine you are having a busy day in your office sitting in front of the computer. Data entry is your life; so exciting. All of a sudden, you get a personal email from a relative that says your cousin is on suicide watch at the hospital. This is very personal information and you would like to keep it to yourself. Later in the day, you are walking in the office and someone says “how is your cousin?” How did they know my cousin had something wrong? You have just been a victim of employee surveillance. As long as the software and video equipment has been around, employers have monitored their employees. Employee surveillance is not illegal, but there is a thin line between wrong and right that deserves more analysis: An analysis of employee surveillance in the workplace reveals an ethical issue of spying on employees or protecting employees and the company. When most people think of the word privacy, they are thinking about their personal space and having some time to themselves without someone or something looking in on them. A further definition is required. “A right to privacy can be understood as a right to maintain a certain level of control over the inner spheres of personal information and access to one’s body, capacities, and powers” (Moore, 2008, p.420). Privacy in the workplace might be a restroom break or even sitting alone in......

Words: 2028 - Pages: 9