Free Essay

Nt1110 Unit 5 Anaysis 1 Pentium Flaw

In: Computers and Technology

Submitted By DINO954
Words 286
Pages 2
Unit 5 analysis 1: Pentium flaw Aaron Mancias April 16 2016 Professor Amos
The CPU is a central processing unit brains of the computer aka microprocessor or processor. It executes a sequence of stored instructions called a program containing millions of transistors interconnected by smell aluminum wires (busses). They carry various signals addresses and data (3 types of data bus, address bus), control bus. The flaw was discovered in 1994, a division error in the Pentium chip by Intel. only told to people who worked inside the company and nobody else .the same month a professor of mathematics at Lynchburg college , Virginia by the name of Dr. Thomas A nicely notices a small difference in the two sets of numbers , rechecking everything he comes to the conclusion ( Pentium chip) eliminating all other causes, 5 month in total . The flaw of the chip cost the company hundreds of millions of dollars and Intel appeared as it was hiding a sinister secret. Intel’s response was very unprofessional and that’s what lead there minor problem into beings so chaotic and costworthy. Basically. DR. Thomas nicely contacted them told them about their problem. Intel duplicates the error and confirms it but do nothing from there also ignoring doctor nicely and never to bother to look back at it. This lead dr. nicely to call up some of his friend such as Richard smith and in two days this minor flaw blew out of proportion. My opinion on how Intel handles the situation is that it was very childish they knew there was a flaw so fix it, every problem has a snowball effect once left without fixing and that’s exactly what happened here and cost those millions of dollars.…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Pentium Flaw

...Ariel Torrente NT1110 Unit 5 Analysis Pentium Flaw Ariel Torrente NT1110 Unit 5 Analysis 7/27/2013 Pentium Flaw The Pentium flaw also nicknamed the Pentium FDIV bug, was an identified error in the Intel P5 Pentium floating unit. The presence of the bug can be checked manually by performing the following application that uses native floating numbers, including Windows Calculator or Microsoft Excel in Windows 95/98 (Pentium FDIV bug). The Pentium flaw was discovered byProfessor Thomas R.Nicely at Lynchburg Collwge,Virginia USA (Emery, Vince). Dr.Thomas R Nicely is a mathematic professor, noticed a small difference in two sets of numbers, he always double-checks his work by computing everything twice, two different ways (Emery, Vince). Dr.Nicely spent months successively eliminating possible causes such as PCI bus errors and compiler artifacts (Emery, Vince). Intel wanted to keep to keep the Pentium flaw a secret, after Intel testers discovered a division error in the Pentium chip (Emery, Vince). Intel managers decided that the error wouldn’t affect many people, therefore no one outside of the company was not informed (Emery, Vince). The pandemonium over Intel’s Pentium chip cost the company millions of dollars and could have been prevented and became an uproar on the internet (Emery, Vince). This was Intel’s first mistake and the company was given a reputation that made Intel not a trustworthy company and not disclosing that information made them seem to be hiding a...

Words: 906 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Unit 5 Pentium Flaw

...The flaw was discovered in June of 1994. The people who discovered it didn’t think it would affect very many people so they didn’t tell anyone and kept it a secret. Then on October 19 the flaw was discovered by Dr. Nicely, not affiliated with Intel. He found that the flaw was coming from the Pentium processor. After contacting Intel they did nothing about it so he began to spread the word. The nature of the flaw was in the floating-point math subsection of the Pentium microprocessor. Under certain data dependent conditions, low order bits of the result of floating-point division operations would be incorrect, an error that can quickly add up in floating-point operations to much larger errors in subsequent calculations. Intel fixed the problem in a future chip revision but didn’t disclose the old one. The bug was easy to replicate by an average user just by entering a certain code of numbers. Intel said this was a minor error and “not even an erratum”. After a negative reaction from the public, Intel offered to replace all the chips. I don’t think Intel handled the problem correctly at all. First off, the flaw was discovered before the release. With that it should have been fixed or put out in the open. They just let it be without telling anyone. It was kept a secret for reasons still unknown. After Intel was called out they did the only thing they could, they replaced all the chips. If a flaw were to happen like this in today’s day and age it wouldn’t be a......

Words: 301 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Pentium Flaw-Nt1110

...Intel engineers discovered a flaw in the floating-point math subsection of the Pentium microprocessor. Under certain data dependent conditions, low order bits of the result of floating-point division operations would be incorrect, an error that can quickly compound in floating-point operations to much larger errors in subsequent calculations. Intel corrected the error in a future chip revision, but nonetheless declined to disclose it. Dr. Thomas Nicely, Professor of Mathematics at Lynchburg College independently discovered the bug, and upon receiving no response from his inquiry to Intel, on October 30 posted a message on the Internet. Word of the bug spread quickly on the Internet and then to the industry press. Because the bug was easy to replicate by an average user (there was a sequence of numbers one could enter into the OS calculator to show the error), Intel's statements that it was minor and "not even an erratum" were not accepted by many computer users. Ironically, the "Pentium flaw" incident, Intel's response to it, and the surrounding media coverage propelled Intel from being a technology supplier generally unknown to most computer users to a household name. Dovetailing with an uptick in the "Intel Inside" campaign, the episode is considered by some to have been a positive event for Intel, changing some of its business practices to be more end-user focused and generating substantial public awareness, while avoiding (for most users) a lasting negative......

Words: 342 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Pentium Floating-Point Unit Flaw

...The Pentium floating-point unit flaw only occurred on some models of the original Pentium microprocessor chip. Professor Nicely, a professor of mathematics at Lynchburg College, had written code to enumerate primes, twin primes, prime triplets, and prime quadruplets. Prof. Nicely noticed some inconsistencies in the calculations in June, 1994, shortly after adding a Pentium system to his group of computers, but was unable to eliminate other possible factors until October, 1994. On October 24th, 1994 he reported the flaw he encountered to Intel. The person that he contacted at Intel later admitted being aware of the flaw since May 1994. The flaw was discovered by Intel during testing of the FPU for its new P6 core, which was first used in the Pentium Pro. An example of the flaw was found where the division result returned by the Pentium microprocessor was off by about 61 parts per million. In November, 1994 the story first broke in an article published in Electronic Engineering Times. In the story, Intel says it has corrected the glitch in subsequent runs of the chip, and Intel dismisses the importance of the flaw saying, "This doesn't even qualify as errata." The story was later picked up by other national and international media. On November 30, 1994 Intel released an in-house study of the flaw, "Statistical Analysis of Floating Point Flaw in the Pentium Processor" H.P. Sharangpani and M.L. Barton, Intel Corporation. The study on the processor minimized the potential impact......

Words: 431 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Unit 5 Analysis 1: Pentium Flaw

...Mr. Valeras-NT1110 Friday, April 18, 2014 Unit 5 Analysis 1: Pentium Flaw Pentium purpose and functions was that it was a microprocessor in the CPU and the chip included a floating point unit FPU also known as a math coprocessor. Unlike the old Intel CPUs that did arithmetic using integers, this was a program that used floating point number. The Pentium chips have the instructions built into the chip which was in the FPUs. It made the Pentium must faster for intense numerical calculations. It’s was more complex and was more expensive than the others. Only to discover a problem with Pentium was that it was incorrectly dividing certain floating point numbers. Fall of 1994, Intel Pentium had a major flaw in there system and was discovered by a professor at Lynchburg College. Thomas Nicely, a math professor discovered a flaw on Intel’s Pentium when he was computing the sum of a reciprocal of a large collection of prime numbers. He checked his computations and discovered his results differ from his theoretical values. He then got correct answers when he ran the same program on a computer with a 486 CPU. There is when he realized an error in the Pentium. Thomas did not receive any responds from Intel only after he posted a general notice on the Internet asking for others to confirm his findings. That’s when Magazine and CNN interviewed him. Intel publicly announced and I Quote ‘’an error is only to likely occur about once in nine billion random floating point divides”, and...

Words: 570 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Unit 5 Analysis 1: Pentium Flaw

...In June, 1994 the media came out with a story that one of Intel’s Pentium microprocessors had a floating point unit flaw (FPU). This flaw had to do with a math calculation that gave out wrong number after you put in an equation. The story about this flaw came to light after Professor by the name of Thomas Nicely, who was a mathematics professor at Lynchburg collage. Nicely was trying to compute the sum of a reciprocal of a large group of prime numbers on his Pentium based computer. When he checked the results they were different by a large amount from the theoretical values. By running the same test program on a different computer with a 486CPU, he came up with the right numbers this lead him to be able to track down the error to the Pentium itself. After finding the problem Nicely send out an email to Intel describing the problem that he had come across in his test. The email stated that there was a flaw in the Pentium floating point unit (FPU). With no response back from Intel Nicely posted a general notice on the internet asking people to confirm his findings. When the media got wind of this story Nicely did some magazine and T.V interviews about what his test resolute showed him. The flaw in the Pentium flaw was not an isolated incident the flaw was quickly verified by other people around the world in the scientific community, which became referred to as the Pentium FDIV bug. When the story first broke Intel’s initial response was to deny that there was a kind of a......

Words: 920 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Nt1110 Unit 1

...Computer Structure and Logic NT1110 Unit 1 Assignment 1: Integrated Circuit Technology Anthony Smith Intel Processor Transistor Count Processor Model Year Transistor Count Intel 4004 1971 2,300 Intel 8008 1972 3,500 Intel 8080 1974 4,500 Intel 8085 1976 6,500 Intel 8086 1978 29,000 Intel 8088 1979 29,000 Intel 80186 1982 55,000 Intel 80286 1982 134,000 Intel 80386 1985 275,000 Intel 80486 1989 1,180,235 Pentium 1993 3,100,000 Pentium Pro 1995 5,500,000 Pentium II 1997 7,500,000 Pentium 4 2000 42,000,000 Itanium 2 McKinley 2002 220,000,000 Itanium 2 Madison 6M 2003 410,000,000 Atom 2008 47,000,000 Itanium 2 with 9MB cache 2004 592,000,000 Dual-Core Itanium 2 2006 1,170,000,000 Core 2 Duo 2006 291,000,000 Core i7 (Quad) 2008 731,000,000 Six-Core Xeon 7400 2008 1,900,000,000 Quad-Core+GPU Core i7 2011 1,160,000,000 Six-Core Core i7 (Gulftown) 2010 1,170,000,000 Quad-Core Itanium Tukwila 2010 2,000,000,000 8-Core Xeon Nahalem-EX 2010 2,300,000,000 Six-Core Core i7/8-Core Xeon E5 2011 2,270,000,000 10-Core Xeon Westmere-EX 2011 2,600,000,000 Quad-Core+GPU Core i7 2012 1,400,000,000 8-Core Itanium Poulson 2012 3,100,000,000 62-Core Xeon Phi 2012 5,000,000,000 Source: Wikipedia August 29, 2013 A History of Microprocessor Transistor......

Words: 516 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Nt1110 Unit 5 Analysis 1: Pentium Flaw

...Unit 5 Analysis 1: Pentium Flaw The Intel Pentium microprocessor was introduced on March, 1993 that was hugely popular among consumers because of its cheap price and decent performance. Unfortunately, the early versions of these microprocessors had a flow within the floating point unit (also called a math coprocessor). This caused the Pentium's FPU to incorrectly divide certain floating-point numbers. Because only certain numbers divide incorrectly and Intel assumed that many users would never encounter the division error, the company decided to keep the issue quiet and fix the problem in updates to the chip. Thomas Nicely, a math professor at Lynchburg College, discovered the error however, and after sending his findings to Intel with no response, he posted his findings on the Internet, where others confirmed his theories. When Intel finally announced the bug, they originally said that they would only replace chips for users that require high-accuracy calculations, but when IBM publically refused to sell computers with faulty chips, Intel offered to replace all flawed Pentium processors. Because Intel chose to keep the flaw quiet, and because they originally refused to recall the product, they caused a great public outcry. Their mistakes also ended up costing them over $475 million and damaged their image. Intel now currently post all flaws and bugs that they find in their products in order to avoid another catastrophe like the Pentium Flaw. Other companies also take......

Words: 252 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Pentium Flaw

...Tiffany M Shamlee Unit 5 Analysis 1 NT1110 Pentium Flaw The Pentium flaw was discovered where the division result returned by the Pentium microprocessor was off by about sixty-one parts per million. When Intel discovered the flaw, their solution was to keep the information within the company. They did not want to disclose any of the information to the public, because of the negative publicity it would bring to the company. The flaw did not affect all microprocessors, only a very small number of customers. I feel that Intel should have openly acknowledged the problem despite the small number of customers affected. Intel determined if customers were affected by the flaw when they called in to report a problem. They did this by inputting a certain code into their system. Once they identified the problem, Intel would then implement a solution. However, if feel if Intel had openly accepted and informed the clients about the issue, it would have most likely saved them money. Their reputation between the company and their existing clients would have also been protected. Intel’s decision and way of handling the flaw caused a lot of their customers to be very unhappy. If this type of flaw was to be found in a new CPU today, the company would surely fail. With a problem in the floating-point math subsection with an error of approximately sixty-one parts per million, this would cause too many problems for the clients today. Especially considering that Intel......

Words: 310 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Unit 5 Assignment 1: Video Summary 3 Cpus Nt1110

...Fredrick Donaldson Nov.5, 2014 NT1110 Unit 5 Assignment 1 Video Summary 3 CPUs In today’s market there are 2 main manufacturers of CPUs: Intel and AMD. There are also some smaller competitors that manufacture CPUs, but they tend to come and go. The way a CPU is organized varies, but here are the basics: The motherboard system bus carries information into and out of the CPU. When the system bus enters the CPU, it’s called a Front side bus. The Front side bus usually uses a 64-bit wide data path. On the side of the CPU you will find a controller. A controller manages the basic functions of the CPU, and controls communication between the motherboard and other components within the CPU. These other components includes one or more ALUs and internal cache. An ALU (Arithmetic Logic Unit), is responsible for solving complex calculations. Having multiple ALUs in a single processor is what gave the early Pentiums their multi-processing capabilities. Communication between the controllers and the ALU uses a 32-bit wide internal data bus. The bus system that supports communication between the cache, the ALU, and the controllers is referred to as the backside bus. The most important thing a person needs to know about a processor is the speed at which it processes information; (CPU speed). There are several ways to gauge CPU speeds. This may sound like an advantage, but oftentimes, these multiple ways are misleading. The speeds differ inside and outside the processor. Internally...

Words: 784 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Unit 5 Analysis 1 Pentium Flaw

...Unit 5 Analysis 1: Pentium Flaw In the summer of 1994, Intel discovered the Pentium Flaw. Once discovered they decided that their chips did not need to be recalled because the chance of the average user finding out about the error was 1 in 9 billion. Thomas Nicely, a professor at Lynchburg College in Virginia, made the error public. He had sent an e-mail to several colleagues. Nicely was using a few computers to compute mathematical problems. He wanted to prove they had enough power to do so. I feel Intel did not handle the problem professionally at all. While Intel knew that there was a flaw in the chip, they continued to send out a defective product. Regardless of who might discover the error, they should have recalled the chip to have them replaced. By deciding to send out the flawed processor, this probably helped the company as well. Before this mistake, not many people were aware of Intel. After months of research, Intel finally decided to recall the chip. Thomas Nicely had then run over a quadrillion calculations on a revised chip and was unsuccessful of reproducing the error. I am unsure of the outcome if a similar flaw like this were to happen today. With the help of social media and the internet, word of any flaw or error today would spread like wildfire. The old rule of thumb is 1 tells 10, well now it's more akin to 1 tells 10,000. I believe that if a homogeneous situation were to occur it would be handled expeditiously and promptly. I’m sure Intel has new......

Words: 287 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Unit 5 Analysis 1 Pentium Flaw

...market, every company is always trying to one up the other to have the newest and fastest. So when a company has a microprocessor with a flaw it turns into a problem in a hurry. Such was the case with INTEL in 1994. Dr. Thomas R. Nicely, a professor of mathematics at Lynchburg collage in Lynchburg VA was the first person to find the flaw outside of INTEL. Dr. Nicely found this flaw in the floating point unit (numeric co-processor). While performing complicate math equations he found that after the eight digit the numbers are incorrect. At first INTEL tried to keep this a secret until Dr. Nicely sent an email to INTEL on October 30th 1994. He explain how he tested many CPU’s and got the same result. Since INTEL did not inform the general public of this flaw until Dr. Nicely made his email public. I believe INTEL should have let the public know of this flaw as soon as they found it so that the people using them could adjust their mathematical data. Since social media made it easy for everyone to share the information it spread very quickly. Once it spread INTEL’s stock closed at $59.50, down $3.25 for the week. I don’t think INTEL handled it correctly, they should of let the public know as soon as they found out about it. Then INTEL should have issued replacements. INTEL finally did apologize by saying it will replace all flawed Pentiums upon request. It set aside a reserve of $420 million to cover costs. INTEL hires hundreds of customer service employees to......

Words: 446 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Pentium Flaw

...Unit 5 Analysis- Pentium Flaw NT1110 February 11, 2015 Instructor Sheila Pearson The Pentium flaw was when a segment among the Pentium CPU’s transistors performed division incorrectly. Engineers for Intel discovered the problem after the product was released in 1993 but they kept it hush hush and decided to fix the problem by using updates to the chip. A mathematician by the name of Thomas Nicely that worked for Lynchburg College in West Virginia also discovered the flaw. At first Grove, who was the CEO of Intel at the time, did not want to recall the product but when IBM got involved and made the announcement that they would not sell any computers that used that CPU chip, it forced Intel to do a recall that cost them about $475 million. In the beginning by keeping it quiet they were doing the wrong thing by trying to deceive the customer. By doing that they could have lost a lot of business from customers who might have felt that they were not trustworthy and were knowingly selling faulty products. But in the end they did the right thing and recalled the chips with the flaws in it which is the right thing to do. They decided to replace all flawed processors upon request and put aside a 420 million dollar budget to do so. They also hired hundreds of employees to specifically deal with customer requests. They placed four fulltime employees to read Internet newsgroups and respond to any and every question or remark about Intel’s products. If this same flaw was to happen...

Words: 356 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Nt1110 Unit 5 Assignment 1

...A port expander is a hardware device that will allow users to utilize multiple devices on a single port at the same time. It is the same principle as using a power strip for the power in a home or a splitter for the cable. For example, if you only have 1 Universal Serial Bus (USB) port, yet you have a USB mouse and keyboard, then you can use a USB port expander to allow one port slot to become multiple ports and plug in the mouse and keyboard. Allowing multiple devices to be able to connect to a single port is a major advantage to port expanders. However, one of the biggest drawbacks is that the speed of that port is now divided throughout all the expansion ports, an example being a 3Gbps port expanded to accommodate 4 ports will now have to split that 3Gbps between all 4 ports and not 3Gbps per expansion slot. There are two types of port expanders: internal and external. An internal port expander will usually connect to the motherboard and have an expansion plate with multiple ports along the box of the computer. An external port expander will plug into an existing port (such as a USB) and will then have multiple connections off of the port expander. Port expanders are also very generic and will allow expansion on just about any computer. There are many ports available that come with port expansion hardware. Some examples are, but are not limited to, USB Port Expander Hardware, Microphone Port Expander Hardware, FireWire Port Expander Hardware, Serial Port......

Words: 335 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Pentium Flaw

...Marcos Corpas 1/18/2016 NT1110 Unit 5 Analysis 1: Pentium Flaw The Pentium processor flaw was a flaw in the floating-point math subsection of the Pentium microprocessor. When certain conditions were met low order bits of the result of floating-point division operations would be incorrect, an error that can quickly compound in floating-point operations to much larger errors in subsequent calculations. Intel corrected the problem in a future revision, but they refused to disclose it. The mathematics professor at Lynchburg College who discovered the flaw was Dr. Thomas Nicely. Dr. Nicely then had an inquiry with Intel and upon not receiving any response from them he posted about the flaw on October 30th 1994 online. Word quickly spread of the flaw and Intel responded by saying that the bug was minor and “not even an erratum”. Since the bug was easy to replicate by the average user, Intel's response about the bug was not accepted by many computer users. When New York Times Journalist John Markoff ran a piece that spotlighted the error, Intel in response to the media coverage changed its position on the matter and offered to replace every faulty chip. Intel put in place a large end-user support organization. This resulted in a five hundred million dollar charge against Intel's 1994 revenue. Interestingly enough, the attention paid to the Intel Pentium Processor Flaw made Intel go from a seemingly unknown computer supplier to a regular household name. The incident is considered by...

Words: 482 - Pages: 2