Premium Essay

Philosophical Sophocles Essay

In: English and Literature

Submitted By yellow05
Words 461
Pages 2
Philosophical Essay

Sophocles once said that nothing in the world was more wondrous than man. Well I think the question is debatable so long as "most wonderful in the world" excludes heaven and all those ecclesiastical bodies. I do believe that humans are the most advanced organisms on the planet. We aren't at the very top of the food chain by accident. We are the smartest and really do have dominion over all over things on Earth. But, this is a double edged sword; although we are the rulers and have a partial right to most animals (like eating them for sustenance), we are responsible for their well-being. Whenever a natural disaster happens or something puts animal life at risk, it's our duty to help them. And whenever we do something that has a byproduct to the environment we are fully culpable and are required to do everything we can to right our wrong. I do believe that we are the smartest and most advanced organisms (at least as far as we know) and rule the animal kingdom; but our wonder may be outdone by the natural awe of nature. Like the power of a volcano or the full force of the ocean.

To answer what we know as the truth, a classic answer would be God. But on a smaller scale we realize that we actually have proof for very few things. Can we really prove that what we see and feel aren't just figments of our imagination. There is a common theory of what if my red is your green and vice versa. Things like this we will never know or have proof of. Although we don't have conclusive proof that anything is real, it is much simpler to believe that it is. So going from there, a lot of what we think is true is based on what is easier to believe, what we believe feels better, or what we hold true from tradition.

I think that when we are conceived, our souls are created uniquely by God. He has a plan for us and our soul is specially designed with the talents…...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Major Philosophical Theories

...Comparison Essay -- Major Philosophical Theories Myria Loper PHI 105 08/23/2012 Michael Boen Comparison Essay -- Major Philosophical Theories In this easy I will talk about three of the different schools of thought; existentialism, phenomenology and hermeneutics. I will do this by comparing each school and provide examples as well as their positions. Existentialists are mainly traditional and academic philosophers. They believe the world is irrational and focus on individuals in a confrontationally state. They also have a hard time communicating, have anxiety and self-doubt. Existentialists believe that if we do not have honesty in confronting problems we can struggle with our problems. (Moore, 2011) Phenomenoligost interest their selves in essential structures found in stream conscious experience. (Moore, 2011). Phenomenoligist believe in phenomena’s; things manifest themselves on their own based on science. These philopsophers have a large impact not in the relms of philosophy, their impact has been more in theroies of science another words scientist are often referred to as phenomenoligost. An example of phenomenology is when you are looking at an object with both eyes open and it appears to be in the center of the table. You close one eye and it appears to be more to the left then to the right. The last one I will talk about is hermeneutics. Hermeneutics believe and deal with the principles of interpretation. The way individuals interact with each other......

Words: 406 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Philosophical Fields

...Philosophical Fields Philosophy is a wide-ranging discipline because it deals with various dimensions of human experience. In order to have a better, complete and deeper understanding of philosophy which is broad in nature we should analyze first its components, parts and fields. We study these parts separately, show there interrelationship as well as their relation as a whole. The two philosophical categories are theoretical and practical philosophy. Theoretical philosophy deals with the acquisition of truth and knowledge while practical aims not only to learn the truth but as well as the application of truth or knowledge to benefit and be useful to mankind. Philosophical fields are classified under theoretical philosophy; epistemology-knowledge, cosmology-physical universe, metaphysics-reality, being and existence, ontology- particular existing things, psychology-mind and consciousness, theodicy- God and Divine doctrine. Therefore theoretical deals with knowing things, aiming knowledge or truth and reflects about nature as well as the relation of things. Under practical philosophy include; semantics- linguistic meanings, logic- thinking and argument, ethics-behavior and good life, aesthetics- art and beauty and the last is axiology-values. This kind of philosophy, concern to the things which perceptible and useful. Its goal is not just finding the truth but applying the knowledge gained for the benefit of the mankind. As life in this world becomes more complicated, it......

Words: 375 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Freud vs Sophocles

...think the action of our subconscious wishes, to tell the unconscious, to implant them in the conscious upon awaking, in order to satisfy our wants, would exist. While covering neurosis he essentially explains it as a solution for the conflict of the conscious and subconscious. Although Freud makes it seem inevitable, the actions a human being makes while suffering this illness is never predetermined nor unavoidable. Sophocles, like the rest of his society whole-heartily believed in fate and it is shown clearly in his play Oedipus Tyrannus. From the play we hold two things to be self evident; that Oedipus’ fate was prophesized, and that the prophecy was self fulfilled. One may argue to that “Oedipus’ and his parent’s actions were actually what fulfilled the prophecy.” The ancient Greeks and Sophocles answer is that any actions didn’t matter. The play could have been written without Laius’ and Jocasta’s, what they thought preventative, actions that propelled his fate to fact, but by showing that no matter what they did the prophecy still came true, show Sophocles beliefs. Oedipus was predetermined to kill his father and marry his mother, and all Athenians were destined to their life picked out by the gods....

Words: 338 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Philosophical Dialogue

...Philosophical Dialogue (from Philosophy Pages) Verbal discussion of serious topics is in no way tangential to the practice of philosophy. From Socratic gatherings to the philosophical conventions of today, thinking things through out loud—and in the presence of others—has always been of the essence of the philosophical method. (Most philosophical texts embody this give-and-take, either in explicit use of dialogue form or by a more subtle alteration of proposal, objection, and reply in expository prose.) Your philosophical education demands that you enter into the great conversation of Western thought. A few suggestions may help: Be prepared Productive dialogue presupposes informed participants. This means that during every class session, each of us will have read the material assigned for the day, we will pay careful attention to what others have already said, and we will think carefully before speaking. Of course, each of us will often be mistaken, but none of us should ever speak randomly. Respect others Joint participants in dialogue show a deep, personal respect for each other. We owe it to each other to listen well and to give each other the benefit of doubt in interpreting charitably what has been said, trying always to see the worthwhile point. Although we will rarely find ourselves in total agreement on the issues at stake, we will never attack or make fun of each other personally. Expect conflict Disagreement with an expressed opinion and criticism of its...

Words: 494 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Sophocles Antigone

...Piety and Justice The wise Henry David Thoreau once stated "It is not desirable to cultivate a respect for the law, so much as for the right." This quote emphasizes that what one follows through obligations of the “law”, whether it is commitments to your city, family or divinity, it may not be what is righteous in regards to your own moral values. This theme of obligations vs. moral justice can be expressed in Sophocles’ Antigone, which can be seen through the main characters Antigone and Kreon, who have opposing views, but actions depict that if the law contradicts one’s moral duties, then one is justified to act in a manner of disobedience. The tragic Greek playwright Antigone is set in a more traditional era of time, where the city of Thebes is organized completely around religion and there are strict gender roles and expectations the citizens must abide by. Men are socially obliged to take care of the city, whilst women are to be taking care of the household, and more importantly are not to be seen wandering out in public. This distinction is important, as in all Greek plays, nothing is coincidence and the polarities between the gender roles plays a huge role in how the characters justify their actions. The play begins with Antigone and her sister Ismene sitting outside the palace the morning after the attack of the city of Thebes. The day prior, their brother Polyneices attacked their other brother Etyokles, and both committed acts of fratricide in pursuit......

Words: 1548 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Philosophical Essay

...Philosophical Essay (tolerance and Justice) William Touvell Ohio Christian University Ph2000 Introduction to Philosophy Van Kuiken May 9, 2011 Tolerance Tolerance is defined as the capacity for or practice of respecting and recognizing another person’s opinions, practices, behaviors, or beliefs. (editor), 1976). Tolerance can cross into many categories of life from different cultures, the type of music we like, moral issues, religion and many others. More and more these days they are teaching our children in school that we must practice tolerance with all groups of people. I have also heard it described as just agreeing not to disagree; so you avoid any arguments or hurt feelings. The other thing that tolerance can be tied into is that of ethical relativism. Nash defines ethical relativism as the belief that moral beliefs that are conflicting at times can be true at the same time in the same sense. (Nash, 1999). The problems with ethical relativism, is that it’s really confusing and it gives way to numerous paradoxical consequences. The biggest one is when one accepts this way of thinking, that there can be no moral code we use that is better than another. Nash put it this way “if there is no transcendent, objective grounds for moral criticism, no side can be more right than the other.” (Nash, 1999). Some of the other points made are that if we accept this belief than why do we strive to become better people, when no human is any better than his fellow man? ......

Words: 932 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Philosophical Essay

...[Name of Student] [Name of Instructor] [Course Code] [Date of Submission] An Essay on Politics, Politicians and Political Parties When the term politician is mentioned, we immediately think of a person of honor. At times, we think that the person may most likely have a criminal record especially if the politician is from a developing country. Another thought is that the person is from a royal family as a prince, king or emperor. Politicians in most cases are entangled in controversies. We tend to see them begging for votes during or around the election time. The often have many promises to the electorate being put across using slogans, posters, and sweet words. These promises give false hopes to the citizens. Almost every time after these elections, these hopes are shattered, and the people then realize they made a mistake to put the politicians in power. In addition, the issue of elections rigging is often the case diluting the effort of the people who were targeting positive change in the governance of their country. The citizens are usually the ones that are greatly affected by corrupt leadership. We, therefore, tend to ask ourselves whether the problem is with the leadership or use of the electorate. Do we lack the ability to choose good leaders? Is the political seat by itself responsible for turning all people that aspire for it to be corrupt? If there is a lack of our abilities to choose a good leader, then action should be taken to decide wisely during......

Words: 1341 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Philosophical Mind

...In Lesson 2, we explored a number of reasons why it is important to develop a philosophical mindset. In this assignment I want you to take one of those reasons and elaborate on it. In at least 250 words, explain why it is important for you to develop the philosophical mindset. Why develop a philosophical mindset? The definition of a philosophical mindset is reason enough for me. An attitude or approach to life that involves the critical examination of beliefs to ascertain what they mean, if they are true, and what value they have. I don’t understand people who just believe things because that’s what other people believe. The depth of critical examination on a certain belief points to the level of commitment you have to that belief. Without critical examination one can’t truly grasp or lean on a belief. Without true beliefs that one can lean on, life becomes vain and unfulfilling. Look at the church for an example. If you have ever attended a church long enough to get to know its members outside the church walls, then this example will make sense. Many church members say they believe in God, that they are saved through Christ and that they are going to heaven when they die. They say that they believe the whole Bible is God’s truth and holy word, including Matthew 7:17 which states; “By their fruits ye shall know them. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?”, and Matthew 7:20 which states, “Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast......

Words: 349 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Sophocles’ Oedipus Rex 2

...Abstract: This essay discusses the ironic qualities of Sophocles' Oedipus Rex. The play is very ironical in that it entwines the themes of free will as well as predestination. Even though we are sickened by the tragic life of Oedipus and the other characters, we are still able to appreciate the ironic characteristics of the play itself. Indeed, we eventually come to realize that man is free and yet he is also fated. Sophocles’ Oedipus Rex The primary characteristic of Sophocles' Oedipus Rex is that it is an ironic play. The play’s irony grasps the audience in a profound way because of the awareness that occurs regarding everything that is going on. Even though we, as observers, are sickened at the tragic life of Oedipus and the other characters, we are still able to appreciate the ironical characteristics of the play itself. The irony primarily exists in the context of man being free, but at the same time, fated. Without doubt, this play very much reflects the Greek vision which emphasizes the immediacy of experience and the nature of man. We see that man is free and that he has free will. At the same time, man also must reconcile himself to a certain fate. Irony is inherent in this very concept. Indeed, as demonstrated in Oedipus Rex, while there is free will in the human condition, there is also predestination to one’s life. In this play, we see how the main character Oedipus is free to run, but ultimately he cannot run away from himself. Oedipus was once a......

Words: 638 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Philosophical Essay Part 1

...Philosophical Essay Part 1 5. Socrates asks Euthyphro, “Are morally good acts willed by God because they are morally good, or are they morally good because they are willed by God?” (1) How does this question relate to the Divine Command Theory of morality? (2) What are the philosophical implications associated with each option here? Divine command theory is widely held to be refuted by an argument known as “the Euthyphro dilemma”. This argument is named after Plato’s Euthyphro dialogue, which contains the inspiration for the argument, though not, as is sometimes thought, the argument itself. The Euthyphro dilemma rests on a modernised version of the question asked by Socrates in the Euthyphro: “Are morally good acts willed by God because they are morally good, or are they morally good because they are willed by God?” Each of these two possibilities, the argument runs, leads to consequences that the divine command theorist cannot accept. Whichever way the divine command theorist answers this question, then, it seems that his theory will be refuted. This argument might be formalised as follows: The Euthyphro Dilemma (1) If divine command theory is true then either (i) morally good acts are willed by God because they are morally good, or (ii) morally good acts are morally good because they are willed by God. (2) If (i) morally good acts are willed by God because they are morally good, then they are morally good independent of God’s will. (3) It is not the case......

Words: 1239 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Essay early cultures of the Mediterranean regions through medieval Europe as surveyed through the visual arts, music, literature, philosophy and social history. The course examines the interaction of cultural experiences that developed and were passed on to later peoples. This course provides a basic foundation for study of all humanities courses and includes reading and writing competencies. Learning Outcomes Upon completion of the course students should be able to demonstrate that he/she: * comprehends the nature, origins and contributions of major western civilizations from cave arts to the fourteenth century. * comprehends the contributions of the arts and humanities to the human experience. * understands religious, philosophical and cultural systems of Western Europe and their effects on society. * is curious and shows openness to new ideas with regards to the course contents. * demonstrates and formulates informed personal reactions to literature and the fine arts using discipline related terminology. Course Information Course Number/Title: HUM 2210 Humanities: The Foundations Reference Number: 425943 Number of Credit Hours: 3 Term/Year/Session/Length: 20161/Fall/A16/16 weeks Course prerequisites: None. Successful completion of ENC 1101 is recommended. Important Dates Class Begins | Monday, August 24, 2015 (A Term) | 100% Refund Deadline | Monday, August 31, 2015 (A Term) | Non-Attendance Drop (A16) | Tuesday, September 1-......

Words: 5195 - Pages: 21

Premium Essay

Reasoning as Philosophical

...Nicolas, Fatima May D. 2014-45876 Spec. Thought WFY, Mr. Romulo Banares What Constitutes Reasoning as Philosophical? Philosophy consists of a very long history of arguments, counter- arguments, thesis, and theories; thus we can also see questions, and answers that lead to more questions and so on. Like most sciences, philosophy has its own procedures and its own approach to inquiries about the world. One of the central objectives of this discipline is to learn and make use of those procedures to understand the mysteries behind existence and reality. It is also a study that aims to find out the nature of truth and knowledge and to discover what is of basic value and the significance of life. As established by its founding fathers the basic business of philosophy is to know what truly exists and the relation among these existents. Reason is a method in which people acquire knowledge and understanding by means of thinking in an organized and clear way. It has played a big role in the progress of different branches of philosophy (e.g. epistemology, metaphysics, etc.) throughout the years. Some of philosophy’s longest running problems are based on reason but reason also paves way for the solution to these problems. In this paper, I will address different examples that exhibit the being philosophical of reason. REASON IN THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENTS Ontological arguments are arguments that assert the existence of a God by......

Words: 1037 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Philosophical Approached

...Running head: PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACHED TO ETHICAL DECISION 1 Philosophical Approaches to Ethical Decision-Making Donald McCoy Strayer University PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACHED TO ETHICAL DECISION 2 Philosophical Approaches to Ethical Decision-Making The problem of freedom can be understood in two distinct meanings; however we will take a more philosophical approach (N.A Berdyaev, 2011). We will define the problem of freedom as choice of good and evil, which conquers and which they conquer not. Also in order to understand the problem of freedom we have to add Free will. Free will has as much to do with making choices and participating in actions as morality fitting into the equation (N.A Berdyaev, 2011). Morality dictates that we have freedoms to be moral and make moral decisions. The chances are if we were to remove free will form the equation then we could not be held responsible for our moral decisions. Another factor of the problem of freedom is responsibility, which is the direct path to freedom. This analogy puts it in to perspective the more freedom we have; the more responsible we are for it. When freedom is involved the words choice and free are synonymous of each other. You can’t have one without the other (Williams & Arrigo, 2008). One would state that we couldn’t choose if we are not free to do so. We would not do the word freedom justice unless we look at ethical decision-making. Freedom when discussed...

Words: 988 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Philosophical Life Essay

...opponent or that your position is slightly more probable than not, use that as your conclusion. It is better to have a weak conclusion and have it match your argument/evidence than to claim to be able to prove something and fall short. 4) Structure your arguments. The standard advice given to people writing essays is to "make sure it has a beginning, a middle and an end". This is not the most helpful of advice: your essay will have a beginning and an end by default as it is of finite length. Rather, it is more important that the work is easy to read, coherent and well-structured. * Know why everything you put into an essay is there. Quotes, footnotes, structuring of paragraphs and so on: for every thing you put into your writing, it should be there to serve the purpose of explaining your thoughts. Don't just include a quote to show off or to 'seem clever': the professor the examiner will see through this. * In some fields, use of jargon is encouraged. Philosophy is not one of these fields. Jargon needs to be carefully managed and used with caution. It is easy to spot the difference between an essay that has thrown in jargon to make up for a lack of content and a good essay. If you don't understand some technical term, don't use it. Complicated arguments are much easier to follow if they use plain language. It will be other philosophers who read and mark your work, and philosophers much prefer well-explained arguments to obscurantism and jargon. Try to write with......

Words: 1821 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Philosophical Issues Raised in Oedipus Rex

...In the play Oedipus Rex by Sophocles (rpt. In James P. Place, Literature: A Reader for Freshman Composition II, 1st ed. [Boston: Pearson, 2011] 122-168) many philosophical questions are raised by Iolaste’s judgement on the oracles. The chorus responds to these judgments at first as the gods are all knowing and anything said otherwise is blasfomous. Then they seem to go into a rant about how if the gods are not right in their prophecy then everything they say is not law. In the end of the play it is revealed that you cannot avoid the word of the gods. Iokaste raises many philosophical questions about the oracles judgement. You can see this when she says, “Thus Apollo never caused that child to kill his father, and it was not Laios’ fate to die at the hands of his son, as he had feared. This is what prophets and prophecies are worth! Have no dread of them.” (143) The chorus responds two different ways to Iokaste. The first way is that they think that the gods are all knowing. You can see this when they say, “And any mortal who dares hold no immortal power in awe will be caught up in a net of pain.”(148) Then the chorus flips the coin by saying if the gods end up being wrong then there is no fate and man determines his own destiny. You can see this when they say, “Words in the wind, and the Delphic vision blind! Their hearts no longer know Apollo, and reverence for the gods has died away.” In the end of the play it is shown that man cannot avoid his destiny. You can......

Words: 389 - Pages: 2