Premium Essay


In: Other Topics

Submitted By 19950721
Words 2248
Pages 9










This essay is an exposition of the concerns raised by Tocqueville in his book Democracy in America particularly his greatest concern that is the possibility of democratic tyranny/tyranny of the majority arising if democracies are left unchecked. Tocqueville observes that the movement towards democracy and equality of conditions having progressed farthest in America was likely to spread to other parts of Europe as well as the rest of the world hence moving him to analyse democratic governments in order to ascertain the merits and demerits of such governments thereby providing substantial solutions to help counter the ills of democracy. These ills are inclusive of democratic tyranny which according to Adamova (2013: 1) is tyranny of the majority founded in public opinion. Tocqueville notes with profound insight that democratic tenets include equality of social conditions, liberty, and active participation of individuals in political matters amongst others however he laments the possibility of democracies becoming a tool of oppression of the minority emotionally amongst others if the majority are allowed to will absolute power and have unrestrained influence over government .It should be noted however that whilst Tocqueville was greatly concerned about the possibility of democratic tyranny he also touches on the subjects of class oppression and democratic or soft despotism which will be illuminated below.
Ryan (1994: ix) states that Alexis de Tocqueville…...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Mc 111 Midterm Pap

...Tyranny and American Democracy Oppression is something dreaded by everyone. This universal fear was a much larger problem in the 1800’s than it is today. Tyranny was a fear that the Federalists, Anti-Federalists, and Alexis de Tocqueville had in common. The Federalists feared tyranny of the majority, or faction while the Anti-Federalists feared tyranny of the aristocracy. Tocqueville feared “soft despotism” but supported tyranny of the patriarchy. While the Federalist and the Anti-Federalists were the visionaries for America who tried to prevent different tyrannies, Tocqueville discusses the hypocrisies in America that the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists were against. The Federalists strongly believed that the newly founded republic needed a large, centralized government in order to discourage tyranny of the majority. Hamilton voices this opinion when he says “a firm Union will be of the utmost moment to the peace and liberty of the States as a barrier against domestic faction and insurrection.” (Hamilton, 66, Federalist No. 9) This is because a large, centralized government uses the system of the checks and balances, which prevent domestic faction and revolt. The Federalists made it clear that they opposed a mob ruling and the minorities being denied their rights. The main danger the new republic faced, they argued, was the superior force of an “interested and overbearing majority.” (Madison, 72, No. 10) The Federalists solution on how to deal with majority faction...

Words: 1795 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Classical Sociology

...Dustin Jones There were many social theorists from the period of the late seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. This period of time is regarded as the period of the Enlightenment. A few of the major figures of this particular “movement” were Rene Descartes, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and Immanuel Kant. They altered the way in which the social world was viewed and helped pave the way for other classical social theorists to explain the individual’s role in society. Karl Marx, Alexis de Tocqueville, Henri De Saint-Simon, and Emile Durkheim are only the names of a few classical social theorists who set out to explore the role of an individual within society. These men believed that Reason, along with the application of a scientific approach, would be able to positively change the world and break through to a new form of power and authority. Although the ideas and theories of these men give rise to far greater advancement in sociological theory, there is a failure in intuition, and thus, a failure of the classical sociological element. The first section of this paper includes an explanation of classical sociology along with an overview of the theories associated with some of the greatest sociologists of this time. The next section of this paper explores reasons and explanations for the failure of classical social theory and interpretations to why before-mentioned theories were compromised. The final section of this paper summarizes some of the conclusions drawn about......

Words: 2468 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Capitalism and Corporation

...skilled will better themselves, and the society becomes focused on socialized self-interest (Novak, 1997). “The paradox of socialism is that it actually results in the opposite of hopes: and unparalleled isolation of individuals from the bonds of personal responsibility and social cooperation (Novak, 1997). Tocqueville said that socialism was like this be protector over men which was like a father and told the men everything to do and provided everything that the men needed to survive (Tocqueville, 1966). Tocqueville also said, “Why should it not entirely relieve them from the trouble of thinking and all the cares of living” (Tocqueville, 1966). The above mentioned statements from Novak and Tocqueville tells us that if the society is ran off of perpetual demand without any responsibility then there will be a few problems. First of all, everyone will only act in a way that is best for them-so called self-interest. Next, the only people who will be able to better themselves are the ones have the skills to get their demands across to the government. According to Tocqueville, the society will become a society filled with people who cannot even think for themselves (Tocqueville, 1966). Not a cold meteor fallen from the sky Novak said the corporation is “not a cold meteor fallen from the sky” to basically say that people have created the meteor (Novak, 1997). So, if you think the corporation is cold hearted then you need to look at the people who created the......

Words: 1738 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Democracy in America (from Tocqueville's Work)

...De la Démocratie en Amérique – Tocqueville The ideal of a democracy, like the one developed by the Americans since 1776, lies in the fact that Men were born equals. This principle of equality has been the foundation of Tocqueville’s thought. All along this book, we can notice that the causes that enable the democratic state of America to be, lies on the particular situation of this country. Indeed, America lives under a pure democracy, without any aristocratic inheritance or revolutionary passions. This country has laws, recognized and applied by “almost” everybody. However, the country also has habits and morals deeply integrated (brought about by the diverse immigration) and particularly powerful. Usually within a democracy, common opinion rules the world. Although, the Americans hold a very particular philosophical vision according to which, each individual, unique, judge things by himself. As a matter, everyone cannot put forward his own opinion about every subject because if it was the case, he would dedicate and lost most of his time to study and, seeing that everything couldn’t be detailed, would go for some approximation. That is why Tocqueville says that, for some special domain, such as religion for example, it is necessary for the human being to come to general ideas. The example quoted by Tocqueville is very forceful and makes us able to catch the consequences of the emanation of an individual thought on this point. Tocqueville clearly distinguishes the......

Words: 798 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

An Exploration of Individualism

...Exploration of Individualism As Described By Alexis de Tocqueville in Democracy In America By Mario A. Griseta Jr The classic work Democracy In America by Alexis de Tocqueville has been the source of scholarly pursuit as well as strife within that same community. Through a brief examination of this text, several of Tocqueville’s arguments helped to define, for me, many of the constructs that made America what it was and that have led to what it has become today. Of the many themes and ideas presented by Tocqueville, his thoughts on individualism struck the loudest chord with me. Tocqueville describes America as a society of joiners because of the fact that it is a country almost entirely composed of immigrants. This, in addition to the pursuit and promise of “equality of conditions” that Americas touted as an unofficial theme, brought citizens from many classes together in closer proximity and relation. Although this sounds like a good thing, and I believe it is, Tocqueville argued that with this blending of social classes and as opportunity increased people would isolate themselves, "bond of human affections is extended and loosened" (p. 483). As people gained wealth and left behind the daily struggle to survive many sought out education and as a result of this enlightenment developed the "habit of always considering themselves in isolation" (p. 484). This individualism is likened to selfishness by Tocqueville but he is careful to point out that he does not believe...

Words: 1293 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay


...people have certain rights, such as self-preservation, that cannot be taken from them. Then, why should majority rule minority? Tocqueville (1945) argues that the doctrine of the sovereignty of the people and the power of public opinion are corollaries to the idea of equality. If all are equal, then no one person has any basis to claim the right to rule other. The only just way to run a society, therefore, is to base decisions on the will of the majority. But does the fact accord moral justification to it? This question has triggered a debate between two main schools of thought in philosophy, naturalists and positivists, for centuries. Naturalists believe that a system of governance should primarily be moral in nature whereas positivists believe that question does not necessarily have be answered in a moral dictate as any law or system of governance posited by man should be taken as such and can be debated for its pros and cons independent of moral enquiry. Many positivists justified Nazism using the argument. John Finnis (1983) argues that it was only the end of Nazism which marked revival of moral justifications of laws/system of government. Ironically, question of whim of a majority more moral than the whim of a dictator struggles to provide a definite answer.Yet the problem with democracy is that it can quite easily lead to despotism. Tocqueville (1945) believes that if there are no checks on the power of the majority to influence the government, then it will have......

Words: 2171 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Marx and Tocqueville's Views on Religion

...Soci- 300 Classical Social Theory Question 1. Compare and contrast the views of religion held by Marx and Tocqueville. Religions, all over the world have always tried to find an association between mankind and nature and a relation between human beings themselves. One of religion’s main goals is to provide rules and guidance that create order and support for the people that follow it. However, the notion of religion and where it came from has been a subject of debate amongst many historians, thinkers, sociologists and philosophers. Karl Marx, the German philosopher, revolutionist, and sociologist, believed that religion was a manmade ideology. He did not believe that God made humankind; he believed we made God (Marx, 1978). Alex de Tocqueville did not believe in what I just previously mentioned. Instead, the Roman Catholic political thinker and historian believed that God created us and he was responsible for providing the people with the proper rules and keys to living in a materialistic and worldly place (Tocqueville, 1972 pp 359). In this paper, I will be contrasting the different views of religion from the perspectives of Karl Marx and Alex de Tocqueville. With that being said, and although by now we know that both thinkers have different views regarding religion, some of their writings show otherwise and in turn, we will find some striking similarities between them. Beginning with the ideas of Karl Marx; Karl Marx was known to be an atheist who strongly......

Words: 1996 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Religion Traditions and Democracy in America

...America     In Democracy in America, Tocqueville is worried about the disappearance of old aristocratic ranks and privileges, and the emergence of democracy.  Tocqueville states that the "key to almost the whole work" can be found in his chapter on the "point of departure" for the Anglo-Americans (Tocqueville, p. 17).  How can this chapter on the early history of Puritan New England shed light on what European governments can do to adapt to democratization?     It seems odd that Puritans would have much to teach Europeans (or Americans today) about democracy.  Tocqueville in fact outlines how vastly different the New England towns were from what we would call democratic.  The leaders who made these laws were intent on enforcing good morals by using the most extreme enforcement. There is virtually no conception of a right to personal privacy.  Their laws were based on a literal reading of the Old Testament and were extremely harsh. For example, in Connecticut, blasphemy, witchcraft, adultery and rape are punished with death. It is a capital crime for a son to say anything disrespectful of his parents.      Tocqueville wants us to focus not on these laws, which he calls "bizarre and tyrannical" (Tocqueville, 27).  Instead, he points out that these tyrannical laws were passed with the "free, active participation of all the interested parties themselves, and that the morals were even more austere and puritan than the laws" (Tocqueville 27).   It is the fact that......

Words: 580 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

On Karl Max

...Introduction Karl Marx, Adam Smith and Alexis De Tocqueville were all philosophers well known for their contribution to philosophy and especially in relation to sociology. All of them agree on the fact that the ways adopted by the new world we have today contributed greatly to the kind of social, political and economic lives that we live. Of great concern to them is the manner in which wealth is distributed among the members of the society whereby those with a certain degree of power are actually in control of all other systems that determine the freedom and capabilities of the rest of the populace. This paper analyzes the views of the three philosophers in regards to the future of the current society and the possible paths that may be taken and the outcomes of adopting the paths or means. When Marx talks of the current society digging its own grave, he means that a time is coming when all the systems that have been established to take care of people’s affairs will collapse. This will be occasioned by a revolution that will arise as a result of people realizing that the current systems do not give back to them in an equal measure to that they themselves give to the systems. Upon realization that the various systems established within any state work for the benefit of the same persons, people will abandon the ways that they have followed blindly for so long and choose a way that will be in favor of the majority. Karl Marx is well known for his contribution to the upholding...

Words: 1382 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Tocqueville Analysis

...Summary 1 At the beginning or Part 2 Chapter 1, Tocqueville says that the most vivid affection equality creates is passion for that equality. Then he says equality can be instituted in civil society and not be in power in the political world. He then goes on to say that in different times and in different conditions freedom has embodied itself to men. It is not connected entirely to one social state and one run into it elsewhere than in democracies. For this reason it cannot build the discrete characteristics of democratic centuries. Towards the middle of the chapter Tocqueville says the belongings that freedom brings display themselves only in the long term, and it is forever successful to fail to admit the cause that gives life to them. One sees a continuation from their birthplace each day. The convenience of equality make themselves acknowledgeable from now on. Lastly Tocqueville says that democratic people have a familiar attachment for freedom; left to themselves they chase it, they adore it, and they will see themselves subdivided from it only within affliction. Revised Summary 1 At the beginning or part, 2 chapter 1, Tocqueville says that the most vivid affection equality creates is passion for that equality. In a slight shift he points out that equality can be instituted in civil society and not be in power in the political world. Elaborating on this point he points out that in different times and in different conditions freedom has embodied itself to men...

Words: 683 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Democracy in America

... Democracy Both Jean Jacques Rousseau and Alex de Tocqueville have been profoundly influential in helping us understand the nature of our society. Their critical analysis provides a platform through which we can engage in pragmatic debate. This paper will attempt to explain the views of both authors while giving a comparative analysis of their ideas. In the early 19th century, renowned French political thinker Alex de Tocqueville embarked on a journey across the Atlantic Ocean to America. His mission was to understand what exactly made American democracy so special. Along the way, much was revealed about the American way of life. In his findings he noted the prevailing sense of individualism amongst the population. He found that most people where predominantly occupied by the notion of the “self” rather than the collective. Unsurprisingly, Tocqueville came to the conclusion that such a way of life would inevitably cause a collapse in America’s social framework. In what can only be called a remarkable display of socio-political prescience, Tocqueville also concluded that the American civilization was destined to adopt a form of governance wherein all actions would be designed to satisfy the will of the individual rather than the will of the collective. The trend towards individualism and selfishness that Tocqueville identified prompted him to come to a series of revealing predictions. He found that a culture predicated on egotism, selfishness and individualism would......

Words: 1187 - Pages: 5

Free Essay


...Liberty Democracy in America is a book that was published in two volumes by the French aristocrat Alexis de Tocqueville. The book is a summarization of Tocqueville’s tour of America in the early 1830’s. He observed the process of democracy in America, race relations, and the notion of equality, which was not bound by class as it was in aristocratic Europe. The chapter of Democracy in America that will be analyzed in this paper is titled, “Situation of the Black Race in the United States, Dangers Entailed for the Whites by Its Presence”. Slavery and American racial mores circa 1830 will be addressed as we continue. At this time, the presence of blacks is the greatest dangers threatening America. African slaves were imported to many colonies and nations other than those in North America, but none of these other slave-importing countries achieved anywhere near the economic growth seen in the United States. Bacon's Rebellion was an event that redefined the notion of race in the United States. Africans were in America long before Bacon’s Rebellion. The Great Migration was a period that the colonies were in desperate need of laborers. Blacks, along with whites, worked as indentured servants. There were black indentured servants that owned land, some even owning slaves themselves. After Bacon’s Rebellion, there was a gradual change in the status of African Americans from indentured servants to slaves. Post Bacon’s Rebellion, there was a great demand for labor and......

Words: 935 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Tyranny of the Majority

...October 6, 2015 The Fight for Democracy Is a “Tyranny of the Majority” happening right now in America, the way that John Stuart Mill and Alexis de Tocqueville described it? Has our system of supposed equality turned against us to a point where the voice of the minority has been drowned out by that of the majority? Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman seems to disagree in his article, “Knowledge Isn’t Power”[1], in which he talks about how the argument for improving education is just a cover-up for talking about the real, underlying issue: that most of the power in the United States is being controlled by a small group of people with most of the money, and that this group is actively trying to keep all of the money to themselves through monopoly. This idea seems to go against that of Mill and Tocqueville’s; the power lies in the 1% of Americans, an extremely small minority. Furthermore, although most of the majority is able to freely speak their mind in various mediums, such as social media, online newsletters, and blogs, they are largely powerless to make much change in the political and economic sphere. Yet another example that a small group holds all of the power! The point to note here is that the current system of oppression of the poor by the rich was allowed to happen under the same circumstances that Mill and Tocqueville feared would lead to the tyranny of the masses. Although we as a nation had cast away the oppressive monarchy, we created a country in which......

Words: 1548 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay


...Alexis de Tocqueville and Karl Marx, a discussion on their ideas as well as a comparison of the two thinkers. Alexis de Tocqueville is an aristocrat thinker From France that provides the most famous and influential views on democracy. In his work “Democracy in America”, he regards America as a land of liberty and democracy due to reasons like mores, geographical and historical advantages, but also provides a foresight on the future of democracy in America, and the threats to democracy and possible dangers of democracy. He believes the puritans were the one that contributed the most to American democracy, since they were all middle-class men with no salient differences when they first settled down in America. Also, they brought religion and political liberty to Amercia. Marx and Tocqueville holds different views on human nature. For Marx, he reflected on what it means to be truly human. Since he thinks that all species-beings are communal beings, he disaprroves things like religion, wage-labour and other forms of alienation that bring us far away from our communal nature and we must overcome them. For tocqueville, he emphazied a lot on dignity and liberty and he thinks that we are all born free and that we have the ability to be the best judge of our own lives. Moreoever, we have natural rights given by gods and that we have liberty and we should respect the rights of others at the same time. Besides, their visions on the future of society are also different. For......

Words: 2277 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

History 1 surprise. The power that the master had over the slaves, which were simply seen as property, was a luxury that the Virginia white man obtained. It was a luxury of power in the state of Virginia. Tocqueville was a political scientist, historian, and politician. He had originally gone to the United States to study innovative prisons, but at his arrival, he became interested in the people of America. Once Tocqueville arrived back to France in 1835, he published a book regarding the people of American and called it Democracy in America. In this book, he mentioned the three races that existed in America during this time period. Also, he mentioned the unequal power regarding each race, which were Indiana American, African Americans (Negros), and Whites. The barriers that lived between these races were education, law, origin and characteristics. Tocqueville explained that each race was from the same country but their “[F]ortune brought these races together and although they are mixed, they do not amalgamate, and each race fulfills its destiny apart” (Reading the American Past 216). Among the land of the United States, these three race each played a role in the upcoming of American, and although these people were upon the same land they did not interfere with one another. Tocqueville describes the life of an African American slave as an isolation between the races, these people were seen as property. African American slaves were told from infancy that his/her race was inferior......

Words: 2046 - Pages: 9