Premium Essay

What Moral Obligation Government Has to Citizens and Communities

In: Social Issues

Submitted By shy2190
Words 1671
Pages 7
Ideologies and Ethical implication of Society
[Name of the Writer]
[Name of the Institution]

What moral obligation Government has to citizens and Communities
The matters of every Country existed in this universe is handled by certain group of people that are elected by residents of that country is called Government, this elected body of people has certain moral, ethical and Social obligation toward their citizens. On the basis of following ethical concepts the moral obligation of the government will be discussed by providing clear examples from the Inside jobs
Social Contract theory
The basic concept of social contract theory is that it provides the need to maintain social order among them to maintain the level of ethical morality, it is very important to develop such order in order to leave the life among each other with mutual respect and trust. According to modern authors like Hobbes who explained that without social contract the live of the people will be dangerous as everyone will be willing to do what he wants (Browne, J, K, 2008).
There are four important factors that every individual require to live the life comfortably and if these are not provided and society without any mutual agreement will be doomed
• Equality of life: (all the basic needs like food, clothing and shelter must be equally provide to everyone)
• Scarcity: (supply of food, clothes and shelter is limited so if it is not equally distributed that economic scarcity will raise and that will be a huge problem to deal with)
• Equality of human power: (in order to lead the live peacefully in the society it in important to provide equal powers to all the citizens)
• Limited altruism: being a human being it is our nature to belief others but this is for limited time period as no one can trust anybody for the long time.
Therefore it is the moral…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

How to Restructure Society so That All Citizens Follow the Moral Law

...Society So That All Citizens Follow the Moral Law A society is an organized group of persons living in a particular region and having shared customs, laws, and organizations ( In other words, the community we live in and the people we interact with are all part of our society. Like professor Robinson said, the first society we are in, is our family. A family can be composed of a mother, father, brothers and sisters. It can also be a single mother and her children or a single father and his children. There are many ways to describe what a family is. In other words, it is the first people who surround you when you are first born and as you grow up. It is at this point where a child begins to learn ethical behavior and moral value. What is Ethics? The dictionary definition for ethics is “a theory or system dealing with values relating to human conduct, with respect to the rightness and wrongness of certain actions and to the goodness and badness of the motives and ends of such actions” ( Our laws, rules, procedures, and policies are founded on ethics. Therefore, it is important that families have good ethics; after all they will be passing it down to the next generation. Family has a very important role in restructuring society so that all citizens follow the moral law; it is with the family where it starts in order to change society. It is here where a child learns to get along with others and develop moral conduct......

Words: 1929 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

What Are Moral Panics

...6/8/12 What are moral panics? What are 'moral panics'? Hayley Burns If we do not take steps to preserve the purity of blood, the Jew will destroy civilisation by poisoning us all. (Hitler, 1938) Surely if the human race is under threat, it is entirely reasonable to segregate AIDS victims, otherwise the whole of mankind could be engulfed. (The Daily Star, 2 December 1988) Although an extreme illustration, the above quotes serve to set up the creation of a 'moral panic'. Just as Hitler's 'facts' were unfounded, so too were The Daily Star and what resulted from both incidents was, in effect, the persecution of two minority groups within society. Hitler's quote stemmed from the use of propaganda, and although it would be fair to say that the essence of what is termed 'propaganda' does not exist in such a force today, it is nevertheless evident that what was quoted from The Daily Star is tantamount to propaganda. Throughout history, the mass media industry has been utilised as a tool to appeal to the public at large, particularly in the field of politics, where people in a position of power can tempt society into believing what they want them to believe. As Eldridge describes "The media, wittingly or unwittingly, reproduce the definitions of the powerful." [Eldridge 1997: 65] This document will examine not only the essence and origin of the term 'moral panic' but the very important nature of the media's involvement in the whole process of creating a 'moral panic'. It was......

Words: 3362 - Pages: 14

Free Essay

Social and Moral Policies of Government

...Social and Moral Policies of Government Philosophy 2000 – Ethics August 13, 2011 Introduction The movie “Thelma and Louise” is based on two friends taking a vacation for a few days to get away from every day social regulations. Thelma’s is married to her high school sweet heart and is a victim of social rules laid by her husband. Louise is the total opposite of Thelma; she does what she wants when she wants. Louise has an on and off again boyfriend who she decides to leave for a few days until he gets his head on straight. Louise tries to live by the policies of the government but soon find if challenging. Thomas Hobbes believed that morality should be understood as the solution to a practical problem that arises for self-interested human beings (Rachels & Rachels, 2010). We all want to live as well as possible; but in order to flourish; we need a peaceful, cooperative social order and we cannot have one without rules (Rachels & Rachels, 2010). He also believed that “without society they would dwell in a “state of nature”, living in fear and engaged in a war of all against all” (Sommers & Sommers, 2010). Thelma is a very naïve person and believes everything someone tells her. Thelma is a housewife who aides to her husband’s every becking call. She lives in a “Social Contract Theory” and her husband is the keeper. Louise is a waitress who is trapped in a life going nowhere. Louise’s boss is getting a divorce and is letting everyone he......

Words: 993 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Politics and Its Relationship Between the Government and the State’s Minority Citizens

...through which people make, preserve and amend the general rules under which they live. Politics is the process of who gets what, when, and how. Lastly, politics is a process of allocating scarce values.2 Various theorists and concepts define what the role of politics is in order to help us get a better understanding of how the study of politics is useful. Politics help us to understand the relationship between the government and the state’s minority citizens. Plato, the student of Socrates, defined politics in his own way. The ideal government proposed by Plato was the adherence of each individual to “universally valid principles” aimed at improving the lives of all the citizens instead of increasing power, prestige, or material wealth of a select few. Plato believed that this ideal government would be ran by individuals ho were full of wisdom and virtue instead of charisma and cunning. This is because in Athenian democracy, leaders were irrationally chosen based on irrelevant details such as family background, wealth, good looks, and persuasive speech. Being that Plato was born a aristocrat, he believed the common or average citizen was incapable of thinking and reasoning intelligently enough to make decisions about governmental affairs. Plato believed that only the most wise and intelligent should rule the state and each individual be allowed to do what he or she was best qualified to do and only that. Essentially Plato’s theory was elitist, there was no way to keep......

Words: 1205 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

To What Extent Has Indigenous Tourism Either Empowered or Exploited Indigenous Communities Is Australia

...To what extent has Indigenous tourism either empowered or exploited Indigenous communities in Australia or internationally. In your discussion refer to at least two case studies of Indigenous tourism. Both past and present, Indigenous culture is becoming increasingly recognised as a significant aspect of the Australian tourism product and experience (Johnston 2006). Therefore, in order to manage the long-term sustainability of Indigenous tourism and involvement of host communities in the tourism industry, the socio-cultural impacts of tourism on Indigenous communities need to be addressed and monitored (Hodgson, Firth & Presbury 2005). Research conducted by various authors have identified positive impacts commonly associated with Indigenous tourism on host communities including conservation of traditional customs and cultural heritage (Tomaselli 2012), sense of community pride, cross-cultural understanding, maintaining community stability and the broadening of horizons (Hodgson, Firth & Presbury 2005). As a result, host communities may recognise the significance and economic value of their cultural heritage. Thus, tourism may come to play a vital role in promoting cross-cultural exchange, education and preservation of Indigenous communities. Conversely, much of the literature regarding this topic suggests that the negative sociocultural impacts outweigh the benefits seen as a result of Indigenous tourism which include disruption to daily life and traditional......

Words: 1678 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Is the Government Justified in Involving Itself in the Private Lives of Citizens?

...Is government ever justified in involving itself in the private lives and personal decisions of its citizens? Why of why not? Yes, the government is always justified when immersing itself in the lives of its citizens, as the benefits of this practice will always outweigh its consequences. This question had a very definite answer when great men like George Washington, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, John Hancock, etc. found our great nation of America: no. Back then, it was very obvious that government should not spy on its own citizens and make decisions for them. This was actually the philosophy that the nation was based off, the Americans were tired of the British government controlling their lives, so they broke free and found the United States of America. But in today’s technologically advancing information age, the question is severely complicated with inventions like the Global Positions System, the World Wide Web, computer chips, the cellular telephone, etc. Of course, there are laws to regulate surveillance on these devices, but the invention of new technologies is passing these laws. As complicated as the question gets, I believe that the government is justified to immerse itself into the private lives and decisions of its citizens for a multitude of reasons. First, government surveillance practices can save lives, put criminals behind bars, or even find missing people, which definitely warrants the need for cellular surveillance. Another example of this......

Words: 1737 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Government What Is Citizenship

...Interviewee Response | What inspired you to become a U.S. citizen? | What inspired me to become a U.S citizen is to receive freedom. | What steps did you have to take as part of the naturalization process? | Fingerprinted, Questioned about personal background and U.S government, Proved I know basic English, and take an Oath of Loyalty. | How would you describe how you felt about the process? | I would say it was very understandable and needed in order to keep the country in order. | How has citizenship changed your life? | I am not quite a citizen yet… I am in the process of obtaining my residence. But when I do I plan to attend school to better my education. | Is your daily life different because of citizenship? | Like I said I’m not quite a citizen yet but it will help me further my education. | Do you feel the process was worthwhile? | Yes, I feel it was well worth the benefits that will come from it. | If you had to, would you do it again? Please explain. | If I had to, yes. There is so much here that I love. I can be free here, I can get educated, I can be accepted. | (Create an additional question.) Do you like the idea of being a citizen? | Yes, it would give me great opportunities and not even to mention the freedom and rights I’ll have. | The purpose of the naturalization process is to test the person trying to become a U.S citizen to check and make sure they are qualified to become one. I believe the process works quite well. They ask what is......

Words: 364 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Citizen Participation of E-Government

...assigned to the individual. The Privacy Act requires that agencies give the public notice of their systems of records by publication in the Federal Register. The Privacy Act prohibits the disclosure of information from a system of records absent the written consent of the subject individual, unless the disclosure is pursuant to one of twelve statutory exceptions. The Act also provides individuals with a means by which to seek access to an amendment of their records, and sets forth various agency record-keeping requirements. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA; Pub.L. 104–191 , 110 Stat. 1936 , enacted August 21, 1996) was enacted by the United States Congress and signed by President Bill Clinton in 1996. It has been known as the Kennedy–Kassebaum Act or Kassebaum-Kennedy Act after two of its leading sponsors. Title I of HIPAA protects health insurance coverage for workers and their families when they change or lose their jobs. Title II of HIPAA, known as the Administrative Simplification (AS) provisions, requires the establishment of national standards for electronic health care transactions and national identifiers for providers, health insurance plans, and employers. The Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 (Pub.L. 107–204 , 116 Stat. 745 , enacted July 30, 2002), also known as the "Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act" (in the Senate) and "Corporate and Auditing Accountability and Responsibility Act" (in the House) and......

Words: 8599 - Pages: 35

Premium Essay

The Moral Obligation Toward Endangered Wild-Life

...The Moral Obligation Toward Endangered Wild-life George Michael Olivas American Military University Professor Myers PHIL320 Environmental Ethics July 24th 2013 Abstract The moral agency of a man, all the same, looms ambiguously but more so mirroring an image of self—an image contrary to the ethical framework as it ought relate to the natural world. The premise by which we often grant moral importance to Homo sapiens is the mere membership within that group of species. Naturally the premise carries with it little to no weight and is nearly fallacious. Ethicist Peter Singer prompts humanity on the realism that the only other criteria by which to judge for moral consideration is sentience which definitively applies to broader a species. Sentience, as it is theoretical, is inclusive of moral consideration, "The capacity for suffering and enjoying things is a prerequisite for having interests at all, a condition that must be satisfied before we can speak of interests in any meaningful way (Singer, 1974).” The application of industry leaves a footprint in the delicate ecosystems of the earth which normally espouses a plethora of creatures known to regulate the respective biosphere. Far before humanity wandered to and fro the earth, animal life met extinction by natural causes nevertheless our dominance single-handedly exploits the environment and pollutes far worse than any means of naturalism—subjecting animal life into......

Words: 2028 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

1.03 U.S. Government: Citizens in Action

...Dear Mr. President, In today’s society, civic and political participation is so important. To keep our government functioning, the people must participate in both their citizen’s duties as well as their citizen’s responsibilities. The more people that participate, the greater insurance of equality and freedom there is. If people ignore their civic responsibilities and don’t help make important decisions, then only a few people are deciding on who deserves government positions. It’s our duty as citizens to protect our rights and participate politically. Now being the President for the past 7 years, you obviously know all this information and might women as to the point of this letter. Well, I write you to tell you that I strongly believe we need a new national holiday for Dorothea Dix. While she is featured in Woman’s History Month, I believe a national holiday should be invoked in honor of her true patriotism, bravery, and belief in human rights. In the 1800’s when she lived, women were treated as the obvious “seen and not heard” of the two genders. But even from a young age, Dorothea was challenging that statement. At only fifteen years old, Dorothea began a small school for girls, who were not welcome in public schools at the time. She continued to teach for many years; until she heard of a troubling experience in a Massachusetts jail influenced her to take up a new cause of observations of the appalling conditions that mentally ill prisoners. Even in such a male......

Words: 651 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Has the Internet Improved Community?

...The Effect of Internet on Community A community is a naturally occurring phenomenon that has the ability to manifest in a variety of forms. They are shared with many of both living and non-living things, but in the case of humans , it also has at frequent times been established by the uniting of a group of individuals who cooperate with one another and share one or more of the same interests . Some might have the opinion that the invention of the internet has aided this unity, such as Howard Rheingold in his article The Virtual Community : “ …I found fellowship and comfort in this unlikely medium. “ (p. 148), while others might say the opposite. I however, after carefully thinking to the extent that my brain would allow , have come to a third conclusion that the internet has for the most part accomplished neither. The world wide web has rather become just another part of the community that man has already put in place, and has therefore changed very little. It seems that community has benefited from the creation of the internet, when in fact it probably has not. As most know, it is true that it allows individuals people to form bonds with one another and share ideas in a quick and easy way. Some may find the internet a very useful way of finding solace in times of desperation .This is shown in Howard Rheingolds article : “ I’ve never met them face to face, although I feel I know something powerful and intimate......

Words: 887 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Moral Obligation

...Moral Obligation In the "Crito" written by Plato, the argument of whether or not it is morally right to escape prison is in question. At the beginning of the dialogue, Crito offers Socrates an escape though Socrates has already made up his mind and quickly refuses this opportunity. For Socrates believes that though he may have been convicted for the wrong reasons, the laws are just. In this essay, I will examine both arguments given by Crito and Socrates. Crito does not start with very strong arguments to persuade Socrates. His first argument is that if he does not escape, he will not only lose a close friend, but people will be left to believe that instead of using his money to save Socrates, he selfishly did not help him. For this Crito would lose his reputation and be looked upon in bad light. His second argument is telling Socrates that he would be able to live happily somewhere outside of Athens. He makes it known that he has friends in places such as Thessaly, and that they would ensure his safety and wellbeing. Crito's final argument seems to be his strongest. He calls Socrates a coward and fool. "No man should bring children into the world who is unwilling to preserve to the end in their nurture and education" (PUT MARK). Here Crito is feeling as though Socrates is taking the easy way out in not escaping. Betraying not only his own life, but betraying his children's lives. Though all three of these arguments seem valid, none of them seem relevant to whether......

Words: 1243 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

O’neill and Donaldson on Mncs Moral Obligations, If Any, on a Global Context

...Introduction Is there an obligation in part of MNCs to be morally upright in the eyes of the world? How wide do moral obligations extend within the global context? MNCs are entities within states that have a large capability in the eyes of the moral law to aid, protect and serve the public. However, in the search for profit, many MNCs will do only as much as they have to in order to be morally upstanding and financially sound. According to some philosophers, including Marx, the public must be protected from and by all organizations in their respective capacity; this includes the state and MNCs that, more often than not, have more power than the states in which they operate. Take, for instance, an MNC in El Salvador, profiting from the affordability of the production process, profiting from the lack of limitations within this one ‘weak-state’ and profiting from the sales accomplished overseas. The state of El Salvador is much weaker than an MNC such as Nike; in this example then, the MNC has the obligation to better the conditions of the state, not deprive it, aid or neglect its social responsibility to uphold ethics while practicing enterprising. This essay questions the reasoning behind Donaldson in Rights and Kinds of Obligations, arguing that O’Neill has a more fair system of distributing the right aid for the protection of all rights. The main question then is: what is the moral obligation of MNCs in the global context after having reviewed both Donaldson and O’Neill’s......

Words: 2106 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Multinational Corporations and Moral Obligations

...relationship to the social order. These questions are said to surround the moral status of the corporation: Is the corporation a moral agent? Do multinational companies have any moral obligations to contribute to the international common good? While dominant management thinking is steered by profit maximization, this paper proposes that sustained organizational growth can best be stimulated by attention to the common good and the capacity of corporate leaders to create commitment to the common good. However, the complex process of re-orientating corporate priorities towards the common good requires alertness and concerted effort if both business and society are to truly benefit. In our contemporary post-modern context, it has become increasingly awkward to talk about a good that is shared by all. This is particularly true in the context of multi-national corporations operating in global markets. The common good dictates that leadership should be judged, first of all, according to moral criteria rather than professional competence. It helps correct the distorted prioritization of the maximization of profit in every business decision, recognizing that businesses have a multitude of rights and responsibilities, and the common good reminds us that the first of these is not always profit-making. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is one of the important principles on which modern business is built and has been a much debated and contested subject in business. Corporate......

Words: 1463 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Political Obligation

...Political Obligation First published Tue Apr 17, 2007; substantive revision Fri Apr 30, 2010 To have a political obligation is to have a moral duty to obey the laws of one's country or state. On that point there is almost complete agreement among political philosophers. But how does one acquire such an obligation, and how many people have really done what is necessary to acquire it? Or is political obligation more a matter of being than of doing — that is, of simply being a member of the country or state in question? To those questions many answers have been given, and none now commands widespread assent. Indeed, a number of contemporary political philosophers deny that a satisfactory theory of political obligation either has been or can be devised. Others, however, continue to believe that there is a solution to what is commonly called “the problem of political obligation,” and they are presently engaged in lively debate not only with the skeptics but also with one another on the question of which theory, if any, provides the solution to the problem. Whether political obligation is the central or fundamental problem of political philosophy, as some have maintained (e.g., McPherson), may well be doubted. There is no doubt, however, that the history of political thought is replete with attempts to provide a satisfactory account of political obligation, from the time of Socrates to the present. These attempts have become increasingly sophisticated in recent years, but they......

Words: 12818 - Pages: 52