Free Essay

Why Does Mills Think That Utilitarianism Provides the Foundation for Justice and Why Does Rawls Reject It?

In: Philosophy and Psychology

Submitted By otiz29
Words 3508
Pages 15
Name
Professor
Course
Date
Why does Mills think that Utilitarianism provides the foundation for Justice and why does Rawls reject it?
Introduction
The concept of utilitarianism is one that has engulfed the philosophical arena with an obscene number of arguments that support and/or criticize it. Generally, utilitarianism is a theory in normative ethics that defines an action as one that ensures maximum utility. Other schools of thought would like to put it as the concept of “maximizing happiness while reducing suffering” (Mills 3).In as much as utilitarianism has continued to receive applause from people and the political scene, other divergent scholars has come up with other theories that seek to compromise the philosophies under which the concept of utilitarianism operates. As a result, utilitarianism has become subject to contradictions from other theories in the field of ethics. The thinking class in other fields of utilitarianism characterizes in as a quantitative yet reductionist approach to ethics (Mills 3). Over time, the concept of utilitarianism has received ideological threats from; deontological ethics which does not assign moral worth to an action based on its consequences, virtue ethics that solely deals with action and habits that results to happiness, pragmatic ethics and other forms of ethics that backs the idea of consequentialism. In a nut shell, the concept of utilitarianism as defined by political philosophers and in relation to justice is becoming a “battlefield” where the philosophical bigwigs continue to come up with ideas and findings that seek to either develop or criticize the existing theories. The need to understand the theories surrounding utilitarianism has given birth to such respected and honorable philosophers like John Stuart Mills and John Rawls. The two philosophers have continued to differ in their presentation of the philosophies governing the concept of utilitarianism. This paper seeks to investigate utilitarianism as presented by the two philosophers and establish the ideological conflicts that exist between the two schools of thought.
The working Hypothesis Mill claims that utilitarianism provides the foundation for justice. He holds that what is just is that that is considered by the greatest number of people to be just. However, this claim has received a challenge from Rawls who proclaims that justice is a question of obeying the individual natural rights. This paper seeks to investigate the ideological differences in the two schools of thought while citing the main reasons why Rawls challenges Mill’s position on the concept of justice.
Discussion
Justice, as the philosophy world would define it, qualifies as one of the most sensitive subjects in political philosophy. Many philosophers have theorized and invented various ways in which the laws governing justice can derive. These theories bases on two main topics; the natural rights theory and utilitarianism and have equivalently sparked a heated debate which has left a mark in the philosophical regime. This essay will seek to evaluate he two schools of thought in light of the two famous and historic philosophers: John Rawls; whose name reminds scholars of his mighty works of the natural rights theories coupled with his sole idea of “veil of ignorance” and John Mills; founder of the principles of utilitarianism and famously known for his idea of the “impartial spectator”. The two theories are subject to a critical and systematic analysis. The paper will start by analyzing Mills’ perspective of justice hen move to Rawls. After that, the paper will attempt to draw the ideological differences of Rawls’ and Mills’ in the light of justice. The paper will then offer a personal justification attesting to the reason why Mills and Rawls might be ideologically correct in their perspective of thinking, citing basic reasons why this could be so.
Mill’s Argument on Justice John Stuart Mill is a renowned philosopher who is popular for his mighty works of utilitarianism and his idea of the “impartial spectator”. Mill attributes the concepts of Justice to utilitarianism, claiming that any action should seek to attain utility as an end result and cause happiness to the greatest number of people. So, what does Mill mean by utility of action? According to Mill, the satisfaction in an action is measured by how happy the society perceives the action. Happiness, according to Mill, is an equal of attaining the intended pleasure or that of avoiding pain (Mill 137). In his argument, Mill also tries to define the concept of real pleasure. He expresses this kind of pleasure not only as the bodily pleasure that lies on instincts and appetite, but also that kind of pleasure that is unsatisfactory to humans who ranks higher than animals given their capacity to think better (Mill, p. 138). In the wake of Mill’s argument, mental pleasures are more superior to the bodily pleasures. In such, Mill expresses that being a fool who is satisfied with the foolishness is not as valuable as being a wise man who is not satisfied (Mill, p. 140). The concept of the importance of the quality of pleasure according to Mill does not go unrealized. Mill reiterates that an action is termed as “just” when it offers happiness to an individual or the smallest group of people. From a utilitarian dimension, actions should offer high amounts of pleasure for the greatest number of people or even the whole society. Therefore, Mill seems to prove that justice can only be achieved through an intellectual maturity of the people in the society by them realizing that they should act in a way that benefits the whole community or society and not in a manner that instigates self-profit. Mill refers to this intellectual maturity as one of the greatest virtues in the entire world. (Mill 147). However, Mill tosses another “side of the coin” to this argument, that the intellectual maturity is only considered good or virtuous if it produces societal happiness. Otherwise, it stands to serve no purpose. “A sacrifice which does not increase, or tend to increase, the sum total of happiness, it considers as wasted” (Mill 148). How does Mill propose to archive this ethical and intellectual maturity? This question now defines the genesis of Mill’s idea of “impartial spectators”. Mill affirms that the only way to attain intellectual maturity is by an existence of a people or citizens who act as the “impartial spectators”. Mill suggests that people should be cognizant of the fact that they, in a social life setting, can only achieve individual satisfaction when their actions aim at attaining public utility. This will encourage people to realize the extent of damage caused by egoism hence; people must attempt to act devotedly to their societies. Mill suggests in his argument that the law should be constructed in such a way that it harmonizes individual benefits with public utility (Mill, p. 148). Mill closes his argument by appreciating utilitarianism claiming that it will help people attain their personal gains in observation of their community members. Mill also suggests that the best way to implant the necessities of utilitarianism starts from the school curriculum, where utilitarianism will be manifested into the minds of people so that they become aware of the importance of acting in the best interest of the society.
Rawls’ Argument on Justice The name John Rawls is remembered by the thinking class and honored as one of the greatest contributors to the natural rights approach. Just like other renowned philosophers like Immanuel Kant, John Locke, Thomas Hobbes and Jean Jacques Rousseau, the late Rawls also thought of a scenario when people lived without a central authority in command. Rawls has then constructed his theories of natural rights on a hypothetical existence of a stateless nation called the “original opposition”. Some of the historical philosophers presented their ideas in form of real experiences and not from an experimented situation. Other philosophers found it easier to call Rawls hypothetical period as the “state of nature”. Rawls seems to hold the perception that in the original position, people do not know the class they belong, what their abilities are, their status and even defining what is good (Rawls 12). Rawls defines this position as living in the “veil of ignorance”. Rawls insists that the situation where people are not aware of their profits or the conception of what is good, do not favor them and neither does it make them feel like single individuals (Rawls, p. 206). That people do not intend to lie or cheat on each other and make plans that are secretive because they do not know what their profit is and they are tempted to think that the original situation is advantageous and fair to them. According to Rawls, the fairness in justice emanates from the original position and equally exhibits the fairness of persons living in such positions. “This explains the propriety of the name justice as fairness: it conveys the idea that the principles of justice are agreed to in an initial situation that is fair” (Rawls 12). Following this precedent, Rawls then argues that burdens as well as benefits, in a society are distributed equally. That no one would compromise someone else’s rights in order to benefit him/her or the society at large. Therefore, Rawls holds that the individual rights are protected in the original position as a result of the disinterested nature of people and the “veil of ignorance”. In his arguments, Rawls shows a sense of individualism and insists that any person’s ideas and thoughts should be tolerated in as far as it does not cause havoc that negates social order; which he says is very crucial in maintaining the freedom both in the individual and social life (Rawls 213). Following this argument, we can then conclude that Rawls derives the bases of justice in the protection of the individual rights and the disinterested nature of citizens as long as their individual rights prevail in a tolerant scene or society. Rawls maintains that the state should construct laws based on the principles of justice and that is should only intervene when there are complications that seem to compromise the untouchableness of natural rights of individuals. Rawls holds that the existence of inviolable natural individual rights should enjoy more superiority than public interest or any other proposal relating to ethics. The base of Justice, according to Rawls is that “....each person possesses an inviolability founded on justice that even the welfare of society as a whole cannot override” (Rawls 3).
The Ideological Conflict The two theories as presented by Mill and Rawls have met at a point of conflict. The “two sides of the same coin” seek to address the concept of justice in divergent perspectives. Generally, a close look at Rawls argument reveals an individualistic type of thinking while Mill presents a collectivist thinking. One thing that makes this section of the essay challenging is that philosophy, as a subject, considers each and every explanation to be correct based on the circumstances under which it is explained. This means that both Mill and Rawls might be correct on the subject of justice and its applications to utilitarianism and natural rights approach respectively. This section of the paper is meant to prove the hypothesis by evaluating the ideological differences in the two theories, explaining: why Rawls rejects Mill’s argument that utilitarianism provides a ground for justice and; why both of them may be correct in their own contexts. In Rawls views, the two theories seem to have close ties. However, they differ in the conceptual make up of important fundamental differences. In this sense, we cannot claim that Rawls’ “veil of ignorance” works as effective as Mill’s idea of the “impartial spectator”. The two ideas are based on totally difference philosophies though they all seek to address justice in their own perspectives. Rawls’ idea of the “veil of justice” claims that both sides of the position mutually take a more “disinterested” perspective than a sympathetic one. Rawls attributes this to the veil of ignorance that serves as an obstacle for people to realize their profits and as a result, they find themselves behaving in a fair manner. “In the original position, by contrast, the parties are mutually disinterested rather than sympathetic; but lacking knowledge of their natural assets or social situation, they are forced to view their arrangements in a general way” (Rawls 187). This serves as one of the major reasons why Rawls seem to reject Mill’s argument. According to Mill’s idea of the “impartial spectator”, people are fully aware of their profits and status as well, but they make it an individual choice to act devotedly in the best interest of the society. Mill suggests that the idea of public utility supremacy over individuals should be inculcated through effective education systems. It is with this perception that Rawls considers Mill’s idea of the “impartial spectator” as sympathetic to people. Rawls argues that the concept of assigning superiority to the public utility and sympathizing with people will create a state of impersonality rather than the intended impartiality (Rawls 188). Rawls claims that the interpretation of Mill’s idea leads to two discoveries, the first one being that; the concept of impartiality can only be successful if individuals are complete altruists. This is explained by the very fact that the “impartial spectators” though fully aware of their profits and status, they still sympathetically choose to act in the interest of attaining public utility. Secondly, Mill’s idea suggests that people attain self profit from public utility. In a nut shell, Mill is selling the idea that people, being aware of their profits, can go ahead to search for their own individual benefits from public utility. Rawls terms this as being egoistic as opposed to impartial (Rawls 189). In the light of these facts, Rawls claims that the concept of utilitarianism if flowed with contractions as it, on one side, appreciates people for their impartiality and altruism yet on the other hand claim that there are benefits of acting in the interest of public utility. It is with this kind of contradiction that the application of the concept of utilitarianism in a society might prove to be hard. The interpretation assigned to Mill’s idea of impartial spectator is that people should act in the interest of public utility in order to egoistically gain individual benefits. This begs the question of what happens if the system does not satisfy their needs. Taking a scenario of a country conducting elections, how would Mill’s idea of impartial spectator work? Furthermore, whose interests does these decisions serves; the society of individuals? And finally, there cannot be a people who are complete altruists. In these texts, it is also evident that Rawls’ idea of natural rights assigns some importance to the human natural rights while Mill’s idea of impartial spectator supports societal benefits over individual natural rights. Rawls criticizes this thought by articulating that the concept of utilitarianism measures people’s values as a function of their thoughts and actions without necessarily appreciating the preciousness of human life. So in order to satisfy many people in a country, one may have to kill the minority living in the same country. This does not in any manner conform to the rules of justice. However, Mill’s can also seek to defend this analogy by arguing that it is humane and reasonable to sacrifice the minority for the survival of the majority. Taking a hypothetical situation that people are in a ship sailing and they identify a potential rapist amongst them. Mill’s idea of impartial spectator would consider this person as a threat to public interest in a bid to save the many young female children and women in the ship. An impartial agent will see this person drown in water defending the ideology that he is working for the public interest. However, free and rational agents would try to put themselves in the shoes of this man. No matter the kinds of crime the man has committed before or intends to commit in the future, Rawls “veil of ignorance” would still assign value to the life of this man. This draws a clear difference between the natural rights and the concept of utilitarianism. Mill’s utilitarianism measures values in accordance with thought while Rawls’ veil of ignorance theory is concerned with the preciousness of the human life. These form the basic foundational difference between utilitarianism and theory of natural rights.
Individual Argument Having analyzed the situation, I have realized that both Mill’s and Rawls’ ideologies also have some contradictions that are worth raising. Rawls might be right to say that the utilitarian view is contradictive in the making. The principle of utilitarianism contains the concept of sympathy and impartiality coupled with self benefit in public utility. Indeed, when the theories merge together as a whole, they create a conspicuous confusion since a person cannot claim to be an altruist if he/she embraces the utilitarian principle with a goal to maximize his/her profits. Alternatively, a person cannot accept to embrace utilitarianism in order to maximize his/her own benefits if indeed he/she is an altruist. However, from a personal dimension, the concept of impersonality does not only apply to Mill’s ideology but also to Rawls’. Do we get to define people living in the veil of ignorance and not aware of their profits as impersonal. Then I think that Mill, with his call for importance of wisdom, have an answer to this. Personally, I would prefer to be an egoist who is very much aware of the underlying realities and the benefits that accrues to me than be a disinterested citizen living in the veil of ignorance and is typically not aware of what accrues of my benefits. It is my opinion that Rawls concept of “veil of ignorance” is not practical in the contemporary world. This is because the 21st century has seen people raised in an informed societal setting whereby people are fully informed of their identities and profits that accrue to them. In the today’s world, it is hard to find people putting themselves in others’ shoes and if the so exist such people they are very few. This, due to the competitive nature of the contemporary world, put Rawls theory in play and as a result I suggest that people be taught to focus on their own profits instead of others’. It is also my opinion that Mill’s idea of utilitarianism can be solid if it is amended to remove the elements of contradiction and prevent if from violation the individual rights of natural justice in the quest of obtaining public utility. Existing literature as well as observational experiments has proved that human beings cannot be complete altruists and even if they find a way to act like one, it would be hard to tell whether it is genuine or egoistical. In the contemporary world, people should contribute to the general happiness of the state. However, this also requires the state to create a peaceful and enhancing environment where people are allowed to choose their lifestyles. This mechanism should be constructed to endorse punishment to persons who seek to interfere with the individual rights. The real situation in the ground cannot work with either of the theories as presented by Mill and Rawls. It would require a combination of both theories with the exemptions of the outliers.
Conclusion
As reiterated before, in the world of philosophy, it is difficult to be right just as much as it is to be wrong. This paper has assessed the full extent of the hypothesis and holds a number of findings. Firstly, due to the contradictive nature of the principles of utilitarianism, Rawls is justified to reject Mill’s position on justice. This is attributed to the fact that there cannot be altruists who embrace utilitarianism for individual benefit let alone the fact that altruism is not achievable in any society. The other reason why Mill stands corrected is that the philosophies that govern utilitarianism do not necessarily reflect on the principles of justice. This is explained by the case example of a rapist in a ship and how the two theories could have handled the situation. Moreover, it is important to note that the paper only agrees to Rawls’ criticism of Mill’s ideas of utilitarianism but does not entirely agree with Rawls’ idea of the “veil of ignorance”. By definition of the natural rights as presented in the paper, Rawls constructed the theory based on a hypothetical existence of a stateless nation. This mean the natural rights theory remains to be imaginary as opposed to the underlying subject of justice that is real. A critical analysis of the “real situation in the ground” has confirmed that both theories cannot survive on their own but rather conjointly, with the exemption of outliers. Therefore, the paper concludes that further research and reconstruction of the theories needs to take effect as the analysis has only proved the partial correctness of the hypothesis.

Work Cited
Mill, John S. Utilitarism =: Der Utilitarismus. London [u.a.: Dent, 1910. Print.
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press, 1999. Print.…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Why Does God Test Us

...Why Does God Test Us? - Scriptures on Testing, as well as 6 Reasons Why God Tests Us. According to God's Word, the Lord is Examining us, and Allowing True Believer's to be Tested, and or Tried. God uses Tests & Trials to (now or later) Reward the Believer for Obeying God's Word (James 1:12), and to Prove their Faith was Genuine (1 Peter 1:7) and more! He will also use Tests to someday PUNISH the Unsaved (Great White Throne Judgment)— those who Refuse to Obey Him (Rom 2:6-10, Eph 5:6). God Tests & Examines Us - Some Facts About Testings 1 - According to God's Word, the Lord is EXAMINING us, and Allowing Our Hearts & Minds to be TESTED, and/or Tried. - 1 Thess 2:4 "We speak as men Approved by God to be entrusted with the Gospel. We are Not trying to Please men but GOD, who TESTS our HEARTS." - Jer 17:10 "I, the Lord, search (EXAMINE) the HEART, I TEST the MIND" 2 - God is Examining & Allowing us to be TESTED ALL the Time - Job 7:18 "You EXAMINE us every Morning & TEST us every moment" 3 - God will use these Tests & Trials to REWARD Believers for Obeying God's Word - James 1:12 "God blesses those who Patiently Endure TESTING and TEMPTATION. Afterward they will receive the CROWN OF LIFE that God has promised to those who love Him." 4 - God will use Tests & Trials to Prove that our Faith was Genuine - 1 Pet 1:6-7 "So be truly glad. There is wonderful joy ahead, even though you have to endure many TRIALS for a little while. These TRIALS will show that your Faith is......

Words: 653 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Why Does Japan Faces Deflation?

...Deflation in Japan impacts economical growth and damages the financial health of the banking system. It is a unique phenomenon that intrigues many economists. Japan has the third largest economy in the world, yet it is unable to find effective ways out of stagnation and deflation. There are many opinions regarding deflation, its causes, and affects. However, this paper covers only a few that interested me the most. It covers factors that contribute to deflation such as high corporate rate, strong yen, and trade surplus. Why does Japan face deflation? According to the World Factbook, Japan has the third largest economy in the world with a 2011 GDP of $5.85 trillion US dollars. It is one of the largest exporters of goods in the world, which contributes to a consistent trade surplus for the country. China, one of the primary Japan’s trading partners, has gained the largest share of Japan’s import’s market due to significantly lower price of goods. Japan is also among the world’s largest and most technologically advanced producers, dominating the export of electronic equipment, machine tools, steel and nonferrous metal, ships, motor vehicles, chemical, textiles, and processed foods. Another important factor contributing to the strength of the Japanese economy is the robotics industry; it possesses more than half of the world’s “working robots” (CIA, 2012). The agricultural sector is small,......

Words: 1970 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Why Does She Stay

...“Why does she stay?” That is the most common question when domestic violence is brought up. Domestic abuse occurs in all races, all economic backgrounds, and in all levels of society and the effects of the abuse can last a lifetime, and the reasons women stay in violent relationships are numerous and multifaceted. There is no black or white reason as to why women stay in abusive relationships. Due to the media and advocacy programs domestic violence is gaining more and more awareness. However, the attention on domestic violence tends to focus on the physical abuse and the effects that causes. The emotional abuse that occurs within a violent relationship is considered just as damaging to the victim if not more. According to the National Coalitional against Domestic Violence, the definition of domestic violence is the “willful intimidation, physical assault, battery, sexual assault, and/or other abusive behavior perpetrated by an intimate partner against another.” As one can see, domestic violence reaches much further than physical violence, but those issues are often overlooked. Even though men can be victims of domestic violence, statistics show that one in four women experience domestic violence in their lifetime (Office of Women’s Health). The form of abuse that is used against the victim is not limited to, but can include isolation, threats, intimidation, and economic abuse. Each one of these forms of abuse causes the victim grave distress and even though......

Words: 1154 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Why Profit Does Not Equal Cash

...WHY PROFIT DOES NOT EQUAL CASH Why is profit not equal to cash coming in?   Some differences such as loans received which do not impact the profit and loss statement are pretty obvious.   Others may not be as obvious but you can break them down into three main areas: -       Revenue is booked at sale.   In many cases a sale is recorded for accounting purposes in the profit and loss statement when a company delivers a product or service.   In many cases, no cash has been exchanged at the time of sale since customers typically have a stated number of days to pay.   So, since profit is partially determined by revenue, a component of that profit reflects a customer’s promise to pay.   Cash flow reflects only cash actually received. -       Expenses are matched to revenue.  An overriding accounting principle is to match the costs and expenses associated with the revenues generated during a given time period.   The expenses charged to the income statement may not be those that were actually paid during that period.   Many will be paid later when they are invoiced by a vendor.  Cash flow reflects the cash that actually went out the door during a period. -       Capital expenditures do not count against profit directly.  A capital expenditure does not appear on the income statement when it occurs.   It is only the depreciation that is charged against revenue over time which is based on the useful life of the item that was purchased.   The cash flow reflects a different story as......

Words: 820 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Why Does Student Fail

...Related Studies and Literature in the Foreign Settings With a competitive job market like these days, employers ask for not only real experiences but also a certain degree in university when you apply for a job. The higher your degree is, the more decent the salary is going to be. Knowing this fact, however, some students still fail to finish their degree before graduating. There are many reasons, subjective and objective ones, why people cannot follow the higher education path till the end. The following three are the most popular causes among the uni-droppers. The first and main cause is financial burden. University fee is a nightmare for most students who just receive little or no support from their parents because it normally accounts for over one third of their income. Besides, they have to cover not only tuition fees but also textbooks which are not cheap for tertiary education. This is not to mention about the students who go to university in another region. They will have to pay for other expenses such as house rent, bills, commuting, medicare, etc. So, there is no choice but to work part-time to pay for the university. By working and studying at the same time like this, it’s easy to fall behind and quit if they are not a good time-manager. In contrast, some students who are well- supported financially want to try how different life is outside the school gate. They suddenly realize that they have made a wrong decision to waste time on daily commute to school...

Words: 340 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Why Does the Same Drug Affect People Differently?

...Why Does The Same Drug Affect People Differently? By: Brianna Morse Basic Genetics and the Inheritance of Genes What are Genetics? Have you ever wondered why you have your mother’s eyes of your father’s hair color? The simplest answer for this would be genetics. Genetics is the study of heredity or inheritance. Genetics helps to explain how traits are passed from parents to their young. Parents pass traits to their young through gene transmission (for example hair and eye color, shape of ears, cheek bones, and mouth shape). Genes are located on chromosomes and consist of DNA (A chromosome is a long, stringy aggregate of genes that carries heredity information (DNA) and is formed from condensed chromatin). They contain specific instructions for protein synthesis. A protein synthesis is the process in which cells build proteins, and a protein is a dietary component that helps with things such as building strong muscles and other parts of the body. Genetic Inheritance of Single Gene Disorders The genetic inheritance process can be useful in predicting what sorts of disorders or mutations that an offspring will have in the future. This can basically be explained and shown in a punnett square. A punnett square is a tool that helps to show all possible combinations of an offspring in a cross of parents the DNA with known genotypes in order to predict the probability of their offspring possessing certain sets of traits. It makes a grid using letters, capital letters to......

Words: 2506 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Why Does Financial Performance Matter

...Essay by Daniel Lustig 18.10.2013 A) Why does financial performance matter? Knowing the financial performance of the company is important because it enables you to see where the company stands, what direction it should go, what decision should be made for its future, and where the company should set its goals. In order to measure the financial performance of the company, we can use different tools for analysis. By analysis we mean a set of measures that helps us to analyze company’s financial results. Financial performance analysis is important from for many reasons. Firstly, vertical analysis shows us how efficiently the company is using its assets to generate revenues. It can be used for comparison of similar companies with different sizes. The vertical analysis helps us see clearly that the company with the highest amount of sales does not really need to be the most efficient one. Secondly, horizontal analysis is a tool that shows us how company’s financial performance develops in time. We use company’s financial results from the previous year as a base to which the results from the current year are going to be compared. Among other reasons, it helps us to evaluate whether the management performance goals, such as a 20% increase in revenue, were reached successfully. B) How can the management accountant improve it? The company can face various challenges, in example: illiquidity, high inventory and its inefficient turnover, low employee retention, high...

Words: 378 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Does the Accounting Profession Deserve Its Reputation? Why or Why Not?

...Does the accounting profession deserve its reputation? Why or why not? At the time Stephen Zeff wrote this article, the accounting profession deserved it reputation it had developed. From it humble begins in the early 19th century, to 2003 when this article was published, the accounting profession’s reputation became tarnished. At the time the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 were passed the intent was to create accounting standards for publicly traded companies. However as time went by the accounting profession faced scandals and deceit. The immense pressure placed on auditors to generate new revenue by retaining existing customers and generating new leads, clouded their judgement about addressing inconsistencies and asking questions. Greed and the pressure to make a profit, further tarnished the reputation the founders of the “Big 8” firms worked to develop. The accounting profession no longer represented honesty, integrity and accuracy. In a study printed int 1976 “the Big 8 firms lacked independence from their clients (Zeff, 9/2003, Pg 201).” Max Block summed it up in 1982 stating the accounting profession “was a term that lost some of its relevance (Zeff, 12/2003, Pg 267). Employees of auditing firms were pressured to expand their services to consulting to keep up with their competition. Professionalism deteriorated and auditors became focused on keeping the company’s they were working for happy. Employees that did not meet the......

Words: 445 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

What Does Conservatism Seek to Conserve and Why?

...What does Conservatism seek to conserve and why? The nature of Conservatism as an ideology is most clearly illuminated when one examines its origins. Conservatism was galvanised as a movement as a result of its rejection of the liberal ideas of the enlightenment on the basis of a negative view of human nature Conservatism at least in terms of its roots is thus, fundamentally reactive – indeed this can even be seen in the title of Burke’s work – Reflections on the Revolution in France This reactive nature can be seen to be reflected in Conservatism’s Summum Bonum – it is pragmatic as opposed to ideological – the preservation of order. As a movement it thus seeks to conserve the societal status quo in the face of changes or the threat of changes – thus it is evident that what conservatives wish to conserve is in fact dictated by the nature of society at the time as opposed to ideological attachments to certain elements within society… However, in the fact that Conservatives view their efforts to conserve as a means to the pragmatic end of social order – the ideas and institutions that Conservatives attempt to safeguard can be grouped together regardless of their contrasting context within societies, due to their shared end This conservation of similar elements within different societies can be seen in the case of moral values – a concept that has been defended by both Traditional and New Right Conservatives… For Early Conservative’s the issue of morality was one......

Words: 745 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Why Does Anyone Need an Mba?

...also aware that my knowledge of American environmental issues is insufficient. Since dealing with aspects of international business will be an integral part of my job as an entrepreneur, it is essential that I fill in these gaps. The NAME School's MBA program is the perfect bridge from where I am to where I want to be. I am attracted by the inventiveness and uniqueness of its entrepreneurial and finance programs, and believe that I will increase my practical knowledge of entrepreneurship by interacting with my classmates. I value the fact that at NAME entrepreneurial education does not stop at the classroom, but rather continues through internships and extracurricular activities. I feel that a business school for entrepreneurs should balance a dose of theory with real-world application, and NAME's curriculum and hands-on experiences through associations, internships, and the management field study provide such balance. I am also drawn to NAME because of the school's emphasis on teamwork and technology, reflected by such exciting courses and programs as High Technology Entrepreneurship, International Finance, 12-week field application projects, and the global immersion program directed to teach global thinking and global action. Additionally, the school's profusion of student groups and its flexible entrepreneurial program -- with electives from 200 courses -- will allow me to tailor my course of study directly to my career interests. It is precisely this flexibility......

Words: 862 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

If Successful, Then Why Does My Frustration Grow?

...If Successful, Then Why Does My Frustration Grow? Stacy Lynn is the Coordinator of Student Activities at Mid-State Community College (MSCC). Stacy has just completed three new student orientation (NSO) sessions. The initial feedback from 525 new students and their families has been overwhelmingly positive. Stacy considers the NSO sessions to be a success, however on a personal level Stacy is feeling anything but success. This is due to the set of circumstances that led to the recent completion of the NSO sessions. Stacy was reassigned the NSO project when her colleague Kim Hickman, Director of Enrollment Management, informed Stacy that she was resigning and, as a result, the NSO was now Stacy’s responsibility. This news caught Stacy off guard for a couple of reasons. First off, Stacy was surprised to be hearing this news from Kim instead of her supervisor Royce Morgan, Dean of Student Services and Enrollment Management. Royce had mentioned potentially moving the NSO under Stacy in Student Activities about four years ago, but nothing ever came of it. Secondly, Stacy had only ever had partial involvement and responsibility in prepping NSO activities. What’s more, Stacy’s department had been operating without a full time secretary, leaving administrative duties to be Stacy’s responsibility. This meant that Stacy would need to now add another huge task to an already full workload. Stacy’s questioning of personal success after the completion of the three NSO sessions is directly......

Words: 1628 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Why Does Society Need Accountants

...One of the main questions regarding accounting in public discussion are the purpose of accounting principles and their use for society. So why do we need accounts and why does the society rely on accounting since medieval times? Frankly spoken society needs accountants since they are necessary for businesses to grow and flourish. Accountants help to solve adverse selection and moral hazard issues resulting from imperfect information within the company and with external parties which could result in a lower profitability of the business operations and a lower efficiency in the capital accumulation cycle. So one can argue that accounting is the backbone of the business financial world. The major functions of accounting and their use for society can be divided into two broad categories, which will be discussed in the following paragraphs. The first accounting category, which is often referred to as financial accounting, is comprised of information that companies intend to make available to the general public to attract new capital investments and to support the business operations. Stockholders, creditors, customers, suppliers, and regulatory authorities need detailed information while dealing with a company. The business provides them with the required relevant information via annual reports and financial statements to reduce the information asymmetries which could result in worse creditor and stockholder relations and which could prevent individuals to invest in the......

Words: 378 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Why Does Organisational Structure Matter?

...119SAM Organising for Business Coursework 1 1. Why does organisational structure matter? Illustrate your answer using appropriate examples ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. This essay will look thoroughly at organisational structure and its importance to businesses. How an organisation is structured determines the way it operates and performs. An organisational structure is the way in which a business divides and uses its resources to complete a variety of task to ensure that objectives are met. It clearly allocates responsibilities to employees and departments. The way an organisation is structures will be dependent on the objectives they hope to achieve. An effective organisational structure should be suited to the business which will maximise efficiency and success. If a business uses an inappropriate organisational structure it will hinder the success of the business. “Good organization structure does not by itself produce good performance ... But a poor organization structure makes good performance impossible, no matter how good the individual managers may be”(Drucker1989). This statement shows the importance of a good organisational structure and how performance in restricted without it. Furthermore organisational structure is importance for a number of reasons. One benefit is that it provides a framework which the organisation can be organised which will allow the firm to achieve key objectives and aims. Also Tasks are able to be......

Words: 2533 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Why the Golden Rule Does Not Work

...Rule is that person A can act, affecting person B, if A would not object in B's position. In turn person B can react, if A would not object to the reaction. (Crabtree, 2001) When all actions in a society follow this procedure, the society cannot be said to be wrong or unjust. The logical flaw in this is that the image involves and affects only two people. However, social reality does not often consist of simple one on one interaction without further consequences. The most obvious failure of the Golden Rule is that it contains no provision for transference of perspective to third parties. The Golden Rule is so limited, that it cannot even give a preferred outcome if three people are involved. Remember the film cliché, where gangster A has a gun to the head of gangster B, who has a gun to the head of gangster C, who has a gun to the head of gangster A, completing the circle? At worst, the Golden Rule is fundamentally wrong in itself. It explicitly states that the perspective of 'the other person' should form the basis of moral judgment. Yet that person can be evil, or at least engaged in evil. Why not assume the other person is self-sacrificing, and willing to suffer harm for my benefit? In reality, kindness is bestowed upon those people who are grateful. In society, kindness is given most freely to those who reciprocate as normal members of society should. If you do not grant a person respect when they are kind to you, they and people around you will cease being kind to......

Words: 943 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Why Does the European Union Have Such a Strong Court of Justice?

...1- Introduction The aim of this paper is to provide an explanation why nowadays the European Union has such a strong Court of Justice (the Court). The paper is composed of four main parts. In the first part we will present a brief overview of the evolution of the Court of Justice through time. The second part deals with the creation of the legal doctrines as a means of empowerment of the Court. In the third part we will discuss the cooperation between the national courts and the Court, and finally the last part is dedicated to the relations between Member States and the Court. It should be noted that in each part of the paper we will bring arguments and various examples to develop a structured and complete answer. 2- The Court of Justice through time The European Court of Justice (Court of Justice under the Treaty of Lisbon ) was created in 1951 as the judicial body of the European Coal and Steel Community. It is based in Luxembourg and is composed of 27 judges, one from each Member State. They are appointed by their Member States for a renewable period of 6 years. The judges are assisted by eight Advocates-General whose main task is to deliver legal opinions. At the beginning the Court of Justice had only three limited functions: • To ensure the administrative compliance of the Member States with the rules of the treaties, • To resolve the disputes in case the EU laws are vague, • To keep the Commission and the Council of Ministers from exceeding their......

Words: 3293 - Pages: 14